Why the Daka's request to send its dismissal to Constitution was refused, speaks the ombudsman

Ombudsman Naim Celaj has argued the decision made against former head of the Central Election Commission (KQZ), Valdete Daka. Daka was addressed to this institution at the request following the dismissal of President Vjosa Osmani, but Celaj says they have been very cautiously considering Daka's request. But from the analysis of this [...]
Daka was addressed to this institution at the request following the dismissal of President Vjosa Osmani, but Celaj says they have been very cautiously considering Daka's request.
However, due to the analysis of the case, it has been refused because it has not exhausted legal means.
We have very carefully analysed Mrs. Daka's request to the ombudsman institution to submit the president's decision to the Constitutional Court to assess whether it is in compliance with the constitution”.
After reviews with professional staff, legal advisers have come to the conclusion that this case does not meet the criteria for sending to the Constitutional Court for reasons that have itself been given the written decision that has been made public. Daka's request has been denied for the reason that it has not exhausted the legal means available to him, and in this case we have been unable to proceed further”.
He added that at the hearing, he has received complaints from citizens concerning impartial judgment that is largely related to procrastinating judicial procedures.
He even said the parties complain that even though legal infrastructure is not standardised the right to exercise a legal means, viewing it as a problem, EO reports.
The “continues to press further to the top of the fair list of impartial judgment that is largely related to procrastinating judicial procedures. We even this year had the largest number of complaints we had in this direction”.
“are also complaints to the central level of ministries regarding various decisions they have made, but mainly are related to effective legal means. So the parties complain that even further despite legal infrastructure this right is not standardised to exercise a legal means and rights from the labour relationship”, said Celaj.










