Charged says 50 euros had been offered to sell the newborn child

This damaged N.A. statement has been made at the Foundation Court in Gjilan on Tuesday, reports “Justice Trust”.

The court hearing has continued with the declaration of the injured in the quality of the N.A. witness, which has said it has issued statements both in the police and the prosecutor and remains close to these statements.

For a child that's a case, this is behind me, with his late husband R.A., they've been taken to the Gjilan hospital in the Gynecology ward, so I've asked the R.F., where the same child is, has replied that the child is in Serbia, later I've been informed he's at Troc<18x1>, has declared damaged N. A

The statement went on to say that after five or six years she went with the R.F., to Bojanoc to have coffee, where she met the R.A., and her husband. There was also A., where I first saw it. And two years ago I went to the home of the R.F., in Rogoqis, that's where I met A., and I haven't met”, she declared.

When I got out of the hospital, the R.F., the R.A., with his husband and A., R.A., he took the boy out of front of the hospital who was in their car, and together we went to White Earth. I and my husband stopped at a cafe while Recib took the baby and left”, declared N.A.

The same one also added that she asked the R.F., why she gave the baby to them, and the same according to her, said that we can't grow.

I don't know if anyone has benefited, but the R.A., in my car has offered me 50 euros, and I've told him I have no children to sell, the same one told me that I'm giving these for respect, and my wish hasn't been to give me a baby”, has declared damage to the N.A.

In addition, judicial examination has continued with material management.

Also, at this stage of the R.A. defendant's defense procedure, lawyer Kadri Syla has proposed to the court that the child's birth certificate issued by Serbian authorities be administered, adding that the child is of age this year.

While prosecutor Agron Uka has rejected such a proposal, arguing that no legal means have been taken advantage of, while on the other hand, it is no contradiction that the child's medical certificate has been issued by Gjilan's Regional Hospital.

The chairman of the court, Judge Sabedin Mushica, has rejected the defense's proposal R.A., lawyer Kadri Syla, as evidence to manage the birth certificate issued by Serbian authorities, with the argument that this fact has been confirmed by the medical report released by Gjilan's Regimental Hospital.

The judicial review has continued with the defense of the defendant R.F., who has declared that he does not plead guilty to the criminal act he is charged with.

He added that I remain close to statements issued both in the police and in the prosecutor.

I didn't force the N.F., to give her newborn child to someone else, as well as I've never prevented her from communicating with her children.

I, the R.A., the R.A., and N.A., had coffee a month ago before the case happens at the coffee shop. I've already told the N.A. to talk to the R.A., and the R.A., about its animal, the deal has been that when they're born to pick up the child, the R.F. has declared.

The same one went on to say that after the birth of N.A., the child was given to the R.A., and the R.A., in the hospital yard where the parent of the R.A. was present, and the brother or sister-in-law.

After this with the N.F., we went on with our car to the village of Rogoqica”, he declared.

“We haven't had any conversations as far as the payment is concerned, we haven't entered that topic”, accused R. F, adding that he is the baby's biological father. I N.A. “, first helped, then we fell in love”, added R.F.

On the other hand, the court hearing has continued with questioning of the accused R.A., who has stated that he does not plead guilty to the criminal offense that I am charged with.

The same has continued its statement, saying I remained on the whole next to statements given to the prosecutor and the police.

I've been with my late husband R.A. now, where the N.A., he gave me the baby at the hospital yard in Gjilan, telling me he's been telling me where he's going, saying he's got the R.A.

Charged R.A., she added that she and her husband have spread words to raise a son. I went to Pristina and asked for children, but they didn't give us because they told me you had 46 times1>, she declared.

The first time I saw them, I asked N.A., why you're giving me the same guy didn't give me any explanation, I don't know why he gave me my son, that kid delivered it to me with two hands”, added charges against R.A.

The same in the end has added that he did not know that taking a child should be done through institutions.

The prosecutor has proposed that today's review be postponed on another day with the reasoning that the final word be prepared.

Defenders of the accused have not rejected the prosecutor's proposal.

The chairman of the court, Judge Sabdin Mushica, has approved the prosecutor's proposal, announcing that the next session will be held on February 2nd, 2022.

According to the prosecution, in May 2003, the defendant R.F. -- deliberately and knowingly -- with the intention of illegally profiting wealth has trafficked newly born A. From his mother-infested N.A., forcing the latter to give her child to the defendant R.H.

This action, according to the Prosecutor, the defendant R.F. did, knowing that he was injured after birth with health problems and that he was trading with people for rich gain.

In this case, he is charged by the Prosecutor for Criminal Work “Trafficking in People” by Article 171, paragraph 1, Penal Code, work that's punishable until 12 years in prison.

The R.A., however, has illegally taken and kept the child A. from the other person, even though he is not entrusted with the same entity.

The R.A. with this act is accused by the prosecution of criminal work “Array or the illegal possession of the child” by Article 249, paragraph 1, of the Penal Code, which is punishable until three years in prison. /Betimy for Justice

Note: The individuals mentioned in this article are considered innocent unless the court finds them guilty of decision of form.