9 minutes agoBislem after the GK conclusion: The constitution is worthy of all, or the carpet whereon it treadeth as in the garden of its father.
Periskopi(4 years ago)
(4 years ago)The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo has found that the Parliament of the Republic of Kosovo has acted in opposition to the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo, when it has decided to sack five members of the Independent Council for the Kosovo Civil Service in June of this year. Faton Bislimi of the LDK through a post [...]
Faton Bislimi of the LDK through a Facebook post has indicated that the Constitution of the Republic should not be made the carpet on which it is written with grate boots for party interests.
According to Bislim Actualisation published today by the Constitutional Court confirms that 62 Kosovo Assembly deputies have violated the country's Constitution when they voted (out-law) for the dismissal of KPSHC members, Periscopi follows.
If because of the decisions of the same court, the presidents of Government have fallen from office, should not the same principle be applied to MPs themselves who, with the court ruling, prove that they violated the Constitution? The double standards have no place in democracy, they begin! The constitution is worth all, and equally, or it becomes a carpet, on which anyone always walks like a father's garden!
Otherwise, the Constitutional Court made this conclusion following the request submitted by the MP PDK, Abelard Tahiri and ten other deputies.
“The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo reviewed the KO 127/21 requirement, set forth by Abelard Tahiri and ten (10) other deputies of the Kosovo Republic Assembly, in which it was asked to become an assessment of the constitutionality of the decision. 08-V-029], of the Republic of Kosovo Assembly on 30 June 2021, for the dismissal of five (5) members of the Independent Supervisor Council for the Kosovo Civil Service.
In assessing the constitutionality of the country's controversial decision, the Court unanimously ruled that (i) the request is acceptable; (ii) the decision [of the June 30th.08/V-029] of the Parliament's June 2021 decision is not in accordance with Article 2 and the Constitution's 101 (Siv) (ii) to abolish the upper decision; (iv) to abolish the Interim Mass determined through the verdict of the Court, October 21st; and (October 21st) refuse to respond to a response to the (4)0> decision is said./Periscope. com/
Full status:
