The VV deputy's wife advanced to UP against the Order: The violater speaks to Periscope about the case

Bleron Faik in a conversation about Periscope has shown in detail how the regulation of the UP's has been violated and all the rules that have been made to him in this competition.

Faik has said the Dollaku-Skreta has failed to meet the first criteria with the UP's rule, because it has conducted studies abroad, while according to regulation, priority candidates have conducted studies in Kosovo.

“I applied to the 44th position of the contest, and of all three members of the assessment commission I have been selected for assistant position, based on the Order (Nr. 191, dt. 16.02.2021) for selective procedures regarding the appointment, appointment and advance of academic personnel at the University of Pristina “Hasan Pristina” based on the appendix IV, points b Connota 17 which literally says “candidates who have completed master studies in the UPP (for specific areas of statuteally integrated studies 5,6 years) and who meet the UP statute criteria, have priority over the candidates that have completed studies in other institutions of education and Kosovo's neighbouring countries, regardless of the existing scores of <x> Blerta Dollaku éreta in the assessment made by members of the Commission for Scientific Activity has collected more points than I have, but it has completed studies at Tirana Medical University for which it is not given priority in the regular election of assistant.”, he said of Periscope.

After that step, Faik says the Dollaku-Skreta “has filed complaints to the Recognition Commission Report, and has received support from the Medical Faculty Council, but contrary to Rule No. 191, appendix IV, point 17”, where, according to him, the Medical Faculty Council has violated the regulation.

So, the Council of Medical Faculty proposal is in full opposition to the High Rule, which is approved by the UPP itself Senate, but is based on the interpretation of UPI Secretary-General for Entering 17 which even finds the frame “is thought to be made in equal terms of candidates applying in the” contest. In this sense the interpretation of the sublegal act (Funota 17) by the administrative body is wrong, because the interpretation of the sublegal and legal acts in the Republic of Kosovo is not authenticly done by the body that has drafted or produced the act, but the interpretation is done by the content of the text, namely. Textual interpretation because any other form of standard interpretation creates the possibility of arbitrary and wrong interpretation of the laws and acts of sublaw.” has said Blair Faik.

Furthermore, Faik points out that from the Rector's Council Council, he has received 4 votes per and 2 against, while the VV deputy's wife, not one vote. After five days, however, Faith's outcome has changed.

“Nanderha, at the meeting held on the 2710.2021 date, by the Rector's Council Council I have received four pro votes for the regular assistant selection in support of the No.191 Regiment, while two votes have been to take the Senate's opinion. For your information, there were six eligible members on the Council of Counsel. Thus, no vote has been for counterCandidate Dr. Blerta Dollaku Shkretta. By the date 01.11.2021 (five days after the vote) after I've sent you an official informational e-mail to the UP and senators about the irregularities that took place at this point in the competition one of the Council members suddenly claims to have changed his opinion and declared that he too feels that the Senate's opinion should be taken at this point.”, he adds.

He says it is for injustice even at the UP Senate meeting and by the Rector, he has been changed votes from 4 to 2 to 3 to 3, but not to mention which candidates were the votes and the VV deputy's wife was voted against by the Order.

“With the date 02.11.2021 at the UP Senate meeting for review and decision to select regular academic personnel under the No.804 competition, d. 14,05.2021 during the presentation to UP senators of the Vlerative Commission's decisions, the Council of the Faculty of Medicine and the Rector's Council for Point 44, in the latter's feature doesn't figure out which the Council of Advisors vote should be taken into account, although the Rector shows that it was initially voted and votes were 4 to 2 and then someone has changed the opinion, and now there are 3 votes, but no mention of which candidate the vote has been and which members of this commission have backed. Consistently trying to neglect the IV appendix, point b Enterota 17 specifying the candidate's choice for a regular assistant call for the first time, the reactor suggests candidate Dr. Blerta Dollaku réveta selecting regular assistant and thus getting the necessary votes of the senators ever present in complete opposition to the High Order, which has been approved by the Senate itself. UP.”, he underlined.

Different, Senate of UP's at the meeting, which he held on November 2, 2021, has appointed VV deputy's wife.

“U announce that at the meeting held on November 2nd, 2021, the Senate of the University of Pristina, based on legislation and regulations in effect, has made the decision that, in the 44th position of the Competition, the appointment and advance of academic personnel at the UP faculties, candidate Blerta Dollaku-Skreta” is said to be the Senate's response.

Senators have voted for Blerta Dollaku-Skreta, giving her priority, despite the same he has not conducted his studies in the UPI, as you see regulation.

With this decision, the University of Pristina Senate has opposed the regulation of selective procedures regarding the appointment, reappointed and advancing academic staff at the UPP faculties, which it has already voted for.

“Candidates who have completed master's studies in the Uptight (for specific areas of the 5,6-year-old integrated studies) and who meet the UP's Statut criteria have priority over candidates who have completed their studies in other Kosovo's higher education institutions and neighbouring Kosovo countries, despite scores collected in respective categories”, says the regulation./Periscopi/