Vjosa Osman adviser's wife also casts serious doubts on RTK Board selection

Konushevci, a longtime professional who is also the wife of Serbian President Vjosa Osmani's media adviser, has been especially disappointed with the treatment of Kosovo Assembly deputies.

“Disregarding and ignoring MPs, who in response used phones and laptops, was as discouraging as they were. The candidate assessment on the other hand, made public by civil society, was as ridiculous as insulting. Like the assessment of the orderliness of the process on the part of civil society that is trying to package this process as a success. Mrs. Conushevci says, Periscope escorts.

She doubts the whole process is based on the principle of meritocracy.

Konushevci even doubts that there may have been some sort of bargain between members of the ad hoc assessment commission and members of civil society.

And maybe as a result of the support of civil society members for the RTK board from this Commission, maybe... ”

Full status and no interference:

Personal monitoring of “workings” of the parliamentary commission in selecting RTK board candidates

The interviews were held on the second floor of the Parliament building, with sufficient space to accommodate about thirty people, MPs, civil society and the necessary administrative staff. But it was too small to accommodate the ignoring, ignoring and arrogant of MPs to the candidates (as I am already made public over five reactions) for worse in the eyes of civil society.

The inner environment with all those people was threatening and giving you the feeling of being in court. Disregarding and ignoring MPs, who in response used phones and laptops, was as discouraging as they were. The candidate assessment on the other hand, made public by civil society, was as ridiculous as insulting. Like the assessment of the orderliness of the process on the part of civil society that is trying to package this process as a success.

This interdependence relationship would best be reflected with that of Comrade Zylo and his subordinate Demkos, or Don Kototot with Sanqo Panchon. That he's not even a bad couple, as my late father would say, because that's what this mating produced Marks with friends. On the other hand, as Kafka would say, Don Kisot's tragedy is not his imagination but Sanqo Pancho. So, even in this case, the tragedy of this Commission is not the unwillingness to assess and judge correctly but the currency made by civil society that fuels public opinion with the illusion of the principle of meritocracy. Maybe this wave comes as a result of the support of civil society members for the RTK board from this Commission, maybe...

Excuse me, but in what universe is the candidate valued for 15 minutes by a commission whose members do not belong to the field and maintain disregardful and irritant attitudes?

Or maybe a question should be put before itself: Forgive me, Your Honor, but in what universe did you believe that you will be valued? And my answer would be: in this universe, during this legislature that I have trusted. I've had cases and cases in the past to contribute to various sectors “pa kurkuru”, but I refused to associate with subjects or such practices.

Now this time, even before the time of the interview came, I have been judged by the media for the courage to compete. The audacity”, which means Obama, or the courage to hope, has made me the point in the media. Bombing headlines that reduced me to being only the wife of the President's adviser, aware that the adviser was there as field professional and not as a fan or militant of any party, aware that the councillor's position has no executive power. Disregarding my 21-year-old experience in local and international institutions, for professional preparation, for contributing to literature and promoting it, in translating literature, and promoting real values in and outside the country, so I became only the wife of So - and - so.

Very few things in the world are more dangerous than mixing power with arrogance and inadequacy! It's already proved to be deadly, but I, as an unimproved idealist, hope to be wrong.

Let it at least be known that this commission, among other things, has violated the RTK Law with both legs, Article 25, paragraph 3 respectively, which ironically defines that RTK board members are outstanding personalities of different fields such as culture, art, cinematography, journalism, justice, and so on.

To choose a board of distinguished names in the field of respective engagement and a board of names of certain professions makes a difference! So this time, only one legal obligation has been fulfilled: since she received the contestants to issue a RTK Bord.

Haemus the RTK Board, others are known confessions!