Eight years ago, he stole TV from Rahovec: He pleads guilty, but the prosecution won't admit it.

At the initial session held Thursday, after reading the indictment by prosecutor Sadri Alija, the accused B. M, he has said he feels guilty of the charge he is charged with, adding that he has done this work alone and not in co-operation with other indictees, reports the “Justice Vow”.

While the other indictees have denied having committed the criminal work they are charged with.

After that, the prosecutor, Sadri Alija, has proposed to the court not to approve guilty pleas, since, according to him, admission of guilt has not become a set of 248 KKPK provisions.

“E rejects admission of guilt on the part of the first indictee, B. M, since such admission is contrary to the device of the indictment, for the fact that the same pleads guilty by declaring that he has committed the criminal act alone, while the same charge is that the criminal offense committed it to co-ordination”, prosecutor Alija said.

After it was considered that the guilty plea has not become a match for the 248 KKPK provisions, Judge Ilir Raskaj has rejected the same.

Judge Raskaj has informed the defendants that within the legal deadline they have the right to present objections, as well as the request to drop the indictment.

However, the same have given up the second review, demanding that the court appoint a trial, where they will face the injured and the witnesses.

Otherwise, the Constitutional Prosecutor in Gjakova, has filed an indictment on April 16, 2018, against B. M, U.T and L.B., with which he charges the same that, in co-ordination, they have committed criminal work “heavy recovery”.

The indictment reportedly between October 15th-17th and October 2013, indefinitely in the village of the Great Krusha of Rahovec, in order for the self to bring illegal profits to the violent property of the N-damaged. St.

According to the indictment of the accused on the critical day after planning the theft, they share roles, so they seize the case because the damaged family is outside, so that from the bathroom window, which was half open, they get a plasma TV from there. “Samsung 97 cm”

In this case, the injured are said to be causing material damage worth 1,000 and 200 Swiss francs.

With these actions, the accused in co-ordination are charged with committing criminal work “heavy theft” from Article 327, par.1, points related to the Article of the Criminal Code, where the head is fined and sentenced to jail terms of three to seven years. /Betimy for Justice

Note: The individuals mentioned in this article are considered innocent unless the court finds them guilty with decision of form.