Jasharaj: As long as I am, there will be no test recognition for teachers.

Chairman of the United Education, Science and Culture Union ( The SBASK, Nundman Jasharaj, said they would never accept the teacher's assessment through testing.

We've said and said it forever, and I even say it in the simplest language so long as I am, and as long as the SBASK has no test assessment. But we've been begging MAST and the government for years to strengthen the sector of professional inspectors and make the assessment closer to”.

“We're not about not to be praised but in a different and closer assessment. Never a test, but professional check through inspectors.

While, Institute Director “Ed Guard”, Youth Qehaja, has said that the teacher's performance is being overlooked. According to him, it is urgent that current legislation be changed, as there is a lack of credibility.

“The performance assessment represents a legal obligation that has been overlooked for years now, this failure to perform has resulted in an extremely large teaching community, which is then returning with a weaker commitment and a commitment to the full of those voluntary teachers”.

It is important to review the current legislation, as it is with a distribution in the self-esteem of the teachers, in the evaluation of portfolios, in the assessment by the school principal, and in small percentages by the inspector that most of them even lack sufficient competence, even for assessment puts a lot into question the credibility and validity, so even if we do a performance assessment under the current legislation the problem would be how reliable those assessments are. To come to a proper formula, we have to come to an assessment of teachers at the school level. Thus, delegate to mechanisms inside school and to a domestic body of overseers. To have these mechanisms is very important meritocracy in employment”.

Educator at the Initiation School “Bajram Curri”, in the Great Slatin, Fidan Hasani, said it needs to be continued with the current evaluation process, where the teacher is assessed by the school management and education inspector.

The “is meant for a very complex process, because of the many indicators used worldwide to assess the performance of teachers, then it's a student assessment, then for free activities. The second is a very complicated process because of the nature of implementation and difficulties, given the limited capacity the Inspectorate has. The third is a very sensitive process because of the recent past and the trends it has had to test teachers, that is, there have been some trends to make some sort of self-traction in teachers, and that has created some dissatisfaction, and a kind of controversy has developed. We currently have an assessment that is done in which part is assessed by the school management a piece by the educational inspector and the rest is self-esteem, I think it should be continued with it, and see where we get to”.

In addition, he said the teaching community does not object to their performance assessment, but Hasani emphasises that a consensus for selecting the method from all actors should be reached.

“No one opposes the teacher's assessment, but must find a compromise, be a consensus on selecting the teaching method. What he personally supported is the teacher's assessment based on the scores of students”.