Following Albin Kurt's controversial statement, Molly's reaction follows: “Aha! ”

It was made especially with a Kurt statement saying that municipalities won by other parties could become the <x0-form opposition to the government”.

Molliqaj has compared those words to the authoritarian positions of the controvers Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko.

“Aha! The problem (read: danger) is to create opposition platforms where no VV is led, not improve the everyday lives of citizens. Chairman Molliqaj said, follow Periscope.

“Opposition reduction is a clear totalitarian tendency. It couldn't be clearer than that. Molly.

Full status:

Who fears the opposition, and why?

“. . The problem will be that there is a clear tendency that municipalities where they won't be V Movement chairman. EVENTION! As mayor, to turn into a kind of opposition platform against the Government, to the outcome of February 14,”, respectively, is not the words of Lucashenco, nor of Orban. It's Kurt who said those words, voice and picture.

Aha! The problem (read: danger) is to create opposition platforms where no VV is led, not improve the everyday lives of citizens. Kurt himself is already accepted by what was suspected of everyone. The municipalities that win the VV become VV's, so they get absorbed. While such embezzlement has something like “around” driven into notions since it combined with the context of local elections, we find the ideological affiliation of Kurti's governing approach.

Power aimed at the disappearance of the opposition by digesting differences cannot achieve it without persecution and oppression. A power that cannot see the possibility in the opposition is the unisono (one-side) power aimed at eliminating differences. A power that sees the opposition as a problem is actually a problem in itself. It's anti-democratic power.

When you say “totalism” and “dictature” people usually link it to brutal view/photo from the archives of history, while the electoral process as their opposite. But history and currentity both testify to the insufficientness of the election process as such. We can't see the political situation through a picture, or just through the vote. He is the power that requires direct and consistent confrontation, to appear in its entirety.

Colonization of the concept “opy”, as it did before taking power under the term “part “ ”), turning them into references to corruption and betrayal, is also the inevitable consequence of the totalitarian nature of such powers. So when he says “plate opposition”, he thinks this term in itself is explaining why any possibility of opposition platforms should be undone. Community-level power is an instrument for that.

The disappearance of opposition is a clear totalitarian trend. It couldn't be clearer than that. Opposition to power that clearly has totalitarian tendencies must be done even through these choices.