Supreme confirms the six-year term for war crimes for Assic

The “is refused as grounds for protection of the legality of the N.A. convict's defender filed against the Constitutional Court Act in Pristina .H.N.5/2019 of the 2412.2020 and the Act of Court of the Kosovo Appeals-APS Special Department.n11/2021 date 12,05.20211>, said in the Supreme Court's ruling.

Assreq was convicted in 2020 of criminal war crimes against the civilian population. He had been practicing violence against two people who had participated in the action against the Albanian population in May 1999. The case had happened in the neighborhood “Emshire”. According to the Foundation Court in Pristina, victims of J.S. and S. As they continue to suffer today, they were forced to drink and sing Serbian feet.

No. The Supreme Court notes that the courts of the lowest institutions, namely the first-degree court as the Court of Fact, has generally provided sufficient reasoning for all administered evidence and also due to the defense of the convict. So, as the Court of the First Court has concluded in its court's act and which the findings as a whole endorsed by the Supreme Court, the prosecution's “scelet is based on evidence of injuries to witnesses S. and J. S, therefore, rightly their testimony has been crucial evidence in this criminal case””.

The bias points out that witness testimony is valued in their entirety, is reliable and consistent evidence, and that the conclusions of the lower judicial institutions also endorse the Supreme Court.