Haradinaj for the clean decline of VVA: This is about Kurt's disappointing approach to citizens.

Haradinaj, in Rubik, said it is the responsibility of party chairman, in this case Albin Kurti, since 30% of the subject is being talked about, Clankosova.tv reports.

This is incorrect, which the chairman of Vetevendosje [Albin Kurti] says. The political subject Vetevendosje in the national and municipal race has never had so much margin of the vote”.

This is a clear drop, clearly explained. You get the election results of every year and you see it's not that kind of distribution. We're not talking about 10% because there's a margin between municipal and national elections, but we're talking about 30% less. So, the political party of 50.2% has dropped to 23%”.

And this is not only about lists or municipal problems, this is also about the approach of Prime Minister Kurti of Vetevendosje government, an approach that is totally disappointing to citizens”.

I was in 2017 as prime minister as Kurti. Three months later we had municipal elections. I was held in September, elections were held in November in municipalities. And we won six municipalities. It's inexplicable, and you can't bear responsibility only to the structure below for this fall, so responsibility is to the party chief, in this case of Prime Minister Kurti, chairman of Vetevendosje”.

Meanwhile, for Albin Kurti's statement that the current list of Vetevendosje cannot be compared to previous ones when he, Vjosa Osmani and Glauk Konjufca, were part of it, Ramush Haradinaj, said he had deceptive access.

It's probably good because it gets that result. He's saying that once you got that result, they stopped giving it to citizens, but he wants to get it through to their structure. The disappointing approach to government is investigated here. It could lose 10%, the difference between central and municipal levels. This is not punishment for VV activists on the ground, it's punishment for the way government is run, to anyone else has given hope in this way of governance. It's been a fraudulent approach, it's criticized them for 20 years of nepotism, family employment, and it's done. He criticized the boards with the militia. He saw it coming. He's got the money, he's got it divided as a social, but he's going to keep the people dependent on”

Do you assess that there could be a fall of Vetevendosje, even in parliamentary elections, if it is taken?

” cannot go in vain, drop 30%. It's a big effect, for opinion, for citizens. The prime minister's approach has been low with the media. He was disrespectful to the media. It wasn't transparent. All of these affect”.

I haven't constantly said my assessment of this government, not to cause consequences to the government and the VV, but if someone says a thought to you, saying it in emotion isn't entirely unfortunate. The order is also good, so even the citizen in this case has appreciated the” situation.