Doubts in the appointment of Glauk Konjufca adviser as UP assistant

At the Faculty of Math-Natural Sciences, he had been engaged since 2019. With the fair competition opened, Education Nuli had applied in calling for assistant at the Geography Department. But after the evaluation commission report was released, the same understood that it had collected 44.04 points, which were not enough to be [...]
At the Faculty of Math-Natural Sciences, he had been engaged since 2019. With the fair competition opened, Education Nuli had applied in calling for assistant at the Geography Department. But after the evaluation commission report was released, the same realized that it had collected 44.04 points, which were not enough to be admitted.
However, Nuli is claiming that candidate Trokap Agaj, who has been assessed at most points and that currently holds the position of Kosovo Assembly Speaker Glauk Konjufca, as well as that of the Adviser for protocol, has forged a clue that secured 10 points.
Nuli says Agaj had written that she was a correspondent in a paper she didn't live in.
Moreover, he says that author correspondent of this work was the very chairman of the assessment commission, Ibrahim Ramadani.
While as the first author in the paper, on the official site of the University of Pristina, it says it figures Valbon Bytyqi, who also had been a member of the commission.
“We have verified since it was very simple that in some publications that were done in the village, authors have been Professor Valbon Bytyqi and Ibrahim Ramadani, and this has been the third and here has been forged and correspondent changed. The correspondent is attempting 10 points. With this counterfeit, I've been damaged because my publications haven't entered this stage because the regulation that came from the UPU has not been counted on my publication. I should've taken 4 points then”, he declared.
He says he made some complaints to the UP's organs, which he expects the decision in his favor.
For the same position, the same doubts have been expressed by Albert Beryl, who claims he was unable to run for an FSHN assistant's position.
This commission was composed by Professor Ibrahim Ramadani, Valbon Bytyqi and Arsim Ejupi. This commission consciously and deliberately fakes the scientific work in which Ibrahimi was author, making candidate Tropic Ajay as such. Here we have a clear favour that has been done unjustly”, was Beryl expressed.
He believes he is better prepared for the same position.
I am currently the author of five scientific works that are indexed on the international platform. This commission in cooperation with the entire managerial structure and the Ethics Council have made it impossible for me, they have not allowed me to do the protection of the subject in time. My theme has been published as two scientific works. I'm not allowed in time to make master's theme defense”, he added Berilla away.
But all these accusations, Agaj denies them.
She, through a written answer, has stated to T7 that the same are trying to damage her image.
The same has even warned civil charges against them.
None of those mentioned in the e-mails stand, first of all, the two persons that were presented in your top-down editing have been against candidates. I, as a candidate, have been praised by relevant positive commissions and possess materials that prove my correctness to the University of Pristina where I am willing to offer at all times. At the moment I am in the process of opening the civil indictment for slander and attempted degradation of my image as the reason for the information of peace shared by people in question”, Tropic Agaj said.
Television has again sent questions to Agate's address, to clarify whether she was aware that she offered a work in which she was neither a correspondent nor a first author.
But the same did not answer before the article was published.
Questions were also sent to the address of two other members of the commission, who were also coauthors in the work.
Neither the professors nor the dean, who by telephone told television that the decision will be made in the Senate.
While the Pristina University Rectorate has stated that the applications will be reviewed at one of the UP Senate's next meetings.












