Defence requires the release of the accused for the murder of Donjeta Pajaziaj

On May 27, 2021, the Foundation Court in Ferizaj has sentenced Naser Pajazitaj to life in prison, charged with killing Donjet Pajasitaj in November 2015.

Against this act, the Appeals Court has filed complaints with the Appeals Prosecutor, who has proposed that the first-degree sentence be confirmed against the accused, reports “Justice Vought”.

While defenders of the accused, lawyers Guzim Kolqaku, Ahmet Tahiri and Ymer Beka have demanded that their defender be acquitted of the prosecution.

These complaints were reviewed by the college promise of Court of Appeals judges made up of judges Aferdita Bytyqi, Geevdet Abazi and Tomislav Petrovic.

Appeals prosecutor Arian Gashi has stated they remain close to the prosecution's proposal, with which they have proposed that the attorneys' complaint be rejected and the first degree plea be confirmed.

Meanwhile, lawyer Ahmet Tahiri has proposed that the accused be released, arguing that the same is not the chief criminal offence, and in no phase of the procedure has it been proven.

I want to initialize that in this criminal procedure over 24 witnesses were heard at all phases, and neither of these witnesses confirms that now Donjeta Pajasitaj's late critical day has been placed in the car of defendant Naser”, Tahiri said.

On the other hand, Tahiri said the prosecutor in the case of his conversation with his colleague, Guzim Kolqak, and the accused's brother, has referred to him in the words “I know Naser has not done this work, but Naser knows who did it and just let me write his name down today.

According to lawyer Tahiri, the prosecution has not been interested in making this case adjourn, and no actions to certain witnesses testify.

“Witness Haki Pajasitaj, in his testimony to the Foundation Court in Ferizaj, in the question of the deceased's mother, refers no longer to enter this job, and surprisingly the prosecution after his arrest releases him in a few hours with an agreement and penalty of”, Tahiri said.

This witness has been proven on the basis of grafological expertise and on the basis of security cameras that wrote four letters to Naser Pajasitaj, addressing the defendant Naser's investigation, nor has the prosecution taken any action against him. The same has information on who did it, it refers to Donjete's mother no more feral than it does, and the prosecution doesn't take care of that kind of work, he added.

On the other hand, Tahiri stated that the Foundation Court in Ferizaj did not analyse the list of calls from the operator “Ipko”, which would prove that the same day on the critical day was mainly in the village of Strellza.

This court also doesn't analyze the list of calls from the economic operator Ipko, which has proven to be the most critical day defendant Nasser in the village of Strellca, and not the place called “The corroon of lalax2>, where there is the lifeless body of the late”, Tahiru said.

In the end, lawyer Tahiri claimed that the Foundation Court in Ferizaj has not impressed the principle “In Dubio Pro Reo”, the dubious facts are always interpreted in favor of the accused and not at his expense.

By contrast, Naser Pajasitaj in March 2018 with the Act of Foundation Court in Pec in absence of evidence had been acquitted, but after the prosecution's complaint, the Court of Appeals had turned the case into a retrial. Foundation Court in Pec

After his return to the retrial, the Constitutional Court in Pec, in March 2019 had convicted the accused and sentenced him to life in prison. This sentence was then confirmed by the Court of Appeals in July 2019.

By November 2019, however, the Supreme Court had violated both acts of Constitutional Court in Pec and the Court of Appeals and the subject into retrial.

Following the return of the case in the retrial, the Constitutional Court in Pec had been excluded from the case and the subject had been delegated to the Foundation Court in Ferizaj, with the excuse to avoid allegations of the justice system.

The decision to delegate the course to Ferizaj was made by the Court of Appeals.

According to the indictment filed on June 8, 2017 by prosecutor Valbona Disa Hayjoya, Naser Pajasitaj is charged with being convicted on November 9, 2015, in the mountains of Stralci, the Decani municipality, and in the very place called at “Lajthia croni“, the defendant, even though he had previously been convicted of murder, deliberately and by gun and such an unknown type, has brutally deprived the victim of life of the same village Pajasitates Paj.

One such thing, according to the indictment, Pajasitaj has done it so that while the victim has been going to work on foot along with her uncle and when they have arrived at the village barn, the victim has continued on its way to the Epper Sherll and as it approaches approximately 150 meters near Nedi Jusey's house, the defendant Naser Pasitaj first passes with his blue-coloured jeep car, which stops the victim's car, then continues in the direction of the mountains and when he reaches the <Kthjic, where he first shoots his gun, and then he takes a few traces of the next to the scene of the scene of the scene, and then he takes a few signs from the next December 27th.

According to the indictment, Pajasitaj is accused of being previously extensive on November 9, 2015, in the village of Strelc County Decani, without authorisation of a gun and a gun of an unknown type and a hunting rifle number 0193117 and 12 rounds of this rifle, in a way that he carried out the most critical offense on a critical day.

Also, according to the indictment earlier and widely in 23,05.2017, in the village of Strellc the Low Town of Decani, the accused without authorisation possessed the weapon and that an AK-47 gun with a serial number 120331141 and 2 caricators to be emptied, so that police during the raid and search at the defendant's house in the bedroom have found and seized the referred weapon as the highest.

With these actions, the prosecution charges the accused that he has committed the criminal act of “grave murder” by Article 179 KPRK's and for criminal work “keep ownership, control or unauthorized possession of weapons” by Article 374 of KPRKU.