Change judge to case known as “

The news of “Justice Vow” has made Judge Hoti himself aware, adding that the session has not yet been scheduled.

The judge said the matter has just been set up and that it needs time to analyze the same, adding that it's very volumeful, reports “Justice Trust”.

Otherwise, the subject was first judged by Judge Becir Kaluldra, and since the judgment was near to its completion, the advance of Judge Kaluldra had contributed to the failure of the subject.

The Constitutional Court in Pristina had later set the course to work on Judge Hope Hyseni, who had held no session.

But even after the case was almost final, when judged by Judge Kaluldra, the same one must begin again. This is after Article 311, paragraph 3 of the Penal Procedure Code stipulates that: “when the delay has lasted more than three (3) months, or when the judicial examination is held before another chairman of the panel, the trial should start again and re-evaluate all evidence”.

Based on the Code of Criminal Procedure, all evidence of witnesses, indictees and other evidence that has been examined by Judge Kaluldra must be reviewed once again from the start by the new chairman of the court, Arben Hoti.

Otherwise, this review from the beginning of the trial has been characterised by procrastination, to a greater extent, at the time it was judged by EULEX judges.

The Special Prosecutor of the Republic of Kosovo (PSRK) has filed two charges, one with 17 people and the other with 22 persons, which, in the latter, was established on October 24th 2016, includes the former delegation. PDK Azem Syla, who according to the SPRK, had also been leader of this group.

Syla and Shaban Syla are also charged with Shaban Syla, Ilaz Syla, Mejid Syla, Arton Vila, Fahredin Gashi, Shpresim Uka, Nuhi Uka, Shqipe Maxhuni, Edvard Gashi, Sabeddin Uka, Ramadan Uka, Avderhaman Brajshori, Lubissha Vujovojq, Gazmun Gashi, Elhame Uka, Lumnije Soopjani, Nyrne Brajshori, Sami Macedonci, Ndusun Palushi, Ramadani, Katarika Hajrullaha and Hajrullahah.

The instance charges the defendants with criminal acts “organised”, “money laundering”, “receive mics”, “heavy malming”, “duty “, “reference to counterlegal judicial decisions”, “The bad use of the official post”, <x14delegisation of the counterfeit context <x> and <x16166>

The defendants are also charged that, in co-operation, through criminal activities, they have deprived Kosovo of social property, including forging official decisions and documents, fraud and other corrupt actions.

Investigations in this case were also made in co-operation with the High Prosecutor for Organised Crime in Belgrade.