VVA spokesman: We're addressing the Constitution on a specific issue, not Kurt.

And this case was for Eem Arifi's vote for Hoti Government, he says, and not for his chairman, Albin Kurti.

He adds that the Court has been able to do two things, confirm or reject the VV's claim.

Albin Kurti and Albulen Haxhiu have not been the target of the Constitutional scuttling.

Under this act, he says Kurti and Haxhiu have no stop to be part of the list for MPs.

Full Posting:

We are addressing the Constitutional Court with one case and specific issues. We've been looking for her opinion about our claim that Hoti Government is illegal since it was formed by Mr. Etem Arifi, who according to us, did not have an MP's mandate because he was previously convicted of a prison offense for more than a (1) year. The court, in this case, has been able to do two things; confirm our claim or reject it. She has confirmed our claim, saying Etem Arifi had no MP's mandate because he was sentenced to prison, so the government, with which he was formed, is illegal. From this point on, he has made it clear that from now on an individual sentenced to prison for more than a (1) year in three (3) years cannot be an MP. That's it. So besides declaring the Government as unconstitutional, this has been the next result from the screening object the Constitutional Court has had. Movement V HOOVER, Albin Kurti and Albulen Haxhiu have not been a subject of examination. Moreover, they are not sentenced to prison. Hence, there is no prohibition on being part of the list and election contest.
See you on February 14th, in the referendum, for good governance, with Albin Kurti prime minister.