Repagon P DS: Everything shares with Kurt, but citizen status must be protected

This party says the Constitutional Court has no business with the elections and the political will of citizens. It is becoming a tool of pressure and organ discipline for politicians.

Pre-profession must be communication of the principles of equality and universality.

Everything shares with Albin Kurt. With his mind and his beliefs. We are convinced that his ideological profile will produce a governing model that needs resistance.

But arbitrary state decisions are no way to deprive anyone of political life. Moreover, what is required here is discipline rather than ban. You can't be an MP, but you can be a prime minister. Backing in front of this nonsense is accepting disciplinary blackmail. Who knows, we'll see if you've really been elected prime minister.

Finally, the court ruling is scandalous in principle. Criminals can also be a traffic accident. This kind of restriction is negligible to the political freedoms of citizens. The decision motivates conformism and obedience for any who act politically. Politics is the space of freedom that we need to expand, not the limit and stop where the action penalises”, says the PSD response.

The lead from this party says the law is the stop that as it multiplies and generalises the rate.

We see the same thing once again, the same explanation remains. It is the law that produces sin, not the opposite. Therefore, social progress has been historically in conflict with the law it can guarantee and maintains the existing”

Full response:

The Constitutional Court has no business with elections and the political will of citizens. It is becoming a tool of pressure and organ discipline for politicians. Justice, before standards are made, must be the communication of principles of equality and universality.

Everything shares with Albin Kurt. With his mind and his beliefs. We are convinced that his ideological profile will produce a governing model that needs resistance.

But arbitrary state decisions are no way to deprive anyone of political life. Moreover, what is required here is discipline rather than ban. You can't be an MP, but you can be a prime minister. Backing in front of this nonsense is accepting disciplinary blackmail. Who knows, we'll see if you've really been elected prime minister.

Finally, the court ruling is scandalous in principle. Criminals can also be a traffic accident. This kind of restriction is negligible to the political freedoms of citizens. The decision motivates conformism and obedience for any who act politically. Politics is the space of freedom that we need to expand, not the limit and halt where action is penalised.

The law is the stop that as it multiplies and generalises becomes the rate. Once again we see the same thing, yet the same explanation remains. It is the law that produces sin, not the opposite. Therefore, social progress has been historically in conflict with the law that can and maintains the existing situation.