Former Police Director Hands Free-False Court Tests of Haradinaj's Kurti

“Ven to be mentioned during his work the plaintiff has never received a remark about his performance, rather he received praise for the professionalism shown during the work”, it says.

Next in the indictment, two former prime ministers have been mentioned.

“I commend the accepted praises for the effective contribution to the advance and professionalism of the Kosovo Police, as well as the written thanks of the former prime minister, Mr. Albin Kurti for dedication and professionalism in managing COVID 19 pandemic, agreed on by the 1505 2020<18x1>, says the indictment.

Ten days ago, the Court of Appeals has turned the issue of Qalaj's proposed security measure for the process of electing the new Kosovo Police Director. Clearly, the first scale approved this request and the competition was blocked.

On Friday, it was again scheduled to hold first-instance sessions. However, only the expansion of the indictment has been made, but not the review of it.

In the hearing, the plaintiff's author, Ademi Vokshi, has handed over to the court a parachute, which was the result of recommendations stemming from the Appeals Court's decision.

After receiving Apel's decision, and since this court has raised the issue of uncertainty over security opponents, I am handing in a copy of the pre-emptive for the expansion of the indictment and proposal for security measures”, lawyer Vokshi has said.

The Kosovo government, as pro Qalajt was first deployed, had sought exemption from case judge Saranda Bogay Sheremetti. But that request was withdrawn at Friday's session.

“Based on the Law of Controversial Procedures are decidently cited the criteria under which the judge's exclusion may be required from the trial of a case, so based on this law, I have not noted any criteria or circumstances that are based and enable such a request”, said representative Iliriana Aydogan.

At the request of lawyer Vokshi this session was postponed for another date, arguing that he had accepted the Court of Appeals ruling two days ago and that there is another hearing at the same time.

About a month ago, the Constitutional Court in Pristina has ruled in favour of Qalaj's complaint of security measures, but that decision, following the Kosovo Government's complaint, by the second-degree court has returned to restoration. Disabilities have been found in the choice of Appeals provided by KOHA, especially at two points.

The definition between the argument of the struck act lies in the fact that the court in the area where it refers to the credibility of right subject to the proposal side, points to the fact that the decision on release from the director's position is illegal, without even proving by the court whether the decision is illegal or not, says Apel's decision. “The Court of Appeals, initiated by this state of affairs, estimates that the position and conclusion of the first-degree court is not fair and legitimate because the pending act of complaint is involved in substantial violations of the contextal procedure provisions”, is further argued.

The Judge of Appeals, Nora Dula-Hammi, has used a contradictory sentence in her argument. He has estimated that Qalaj has not been fired by the Hoti government, but has been relieved of duty, which, according to her, these are not the same thing.

“Turns out that the plaintiff has not broken his working relationship or been downloaded, but has been relieved of task”, argued away.

In contrast, however, the interpretation of Judge Dula is said in the Kosovo Police Law.

In Article 39 of the Law, release and dismissal are named the same.

“Set free from office by Director General and Deputy Directors General: 1. Director General or Deputy Directors General is relieved or dismissed from office by the authority he has appointed, for one of the following reasons: 1.1. was convicted of criminal offence, 1.2. He reaches retirement; 1.3. quits; 1.4. because of the inability to exercise office for a period of no longer than six (6) months; 1.5. By the end of the term; 1.6. Because of the poor performance documented”, this law says.