“LDK must go to elections alone”

Through a long Facebook text, Demolli has shown some of the reasons why the LDK should go on its own without making a coalition with other parties.

Demolli said pre-election coalitions are harmful to the LDK and that this party must compete alone to see how much recent developments have affected.

Full Posting:

LDK FIGHT WRITER IN THE CHOOSE February 2021!

Just days before the election list is submitted, in which elections I am not willing and interested to participate as candidate for MP, some small political subjects are interested in making a coalition with the LDK, respectively, that on the LDK election list, they introduce specific numbers of their candidates.

Despite demands, desires, interests and prayers of subjects offered for coalition, I think that in the February 2021 elections, the LDK should compete as the only political subject, among other things:

The LDK voteer is extremely liberal, which means that he is not controlled and congregated (as they do to some other parties), so when on the LDK's list there will be candidates of other parties, they will be severely compensated “from a large number of LDK voters. Unfortunately, we, like the LDK, have experienced this poor experience in the 2017 elections, when from LDK voters, mostly the candidates of the Alternative and AKR, such as Mimoza Kusarin, Behxhet Pacolli, Ilir Deday, Korab Sejdiu and even Labino Tahiri, were voted by 1015 votes, who otherwise as if not on the LDK list, would hardly get such a large number of votes;

If there are 1015 other parties' candidates on the LDK list, then 1015 devoted LDK members will remain out of the list, and this is not an appropriate option for LDK, especially at the time of unrecognizable developments, when former MPs, municipal assablists, branch activists and its submarines are positioned on the side of the LDK's NCCR. So it is not fair to introduce candidates of other parties who are not distinguished by any political-professional quality, which would make more successful than devout candidates proposed by the LDK branches. Even if each candidate (who will remain outside the LDK list) along with families, their friends would bring 800-1,200 votes, which means that, overall, there would be about 10,000, this total number AKR doesn't. So to the devoted member of the LDK, its good leadership is to act according to popular proverbial words respect the stranger, while your love and honor. )

During the 2017 elections, when we were in coalition with the AKR and the Alternative, the main burden of organising electoral gatherings has been carried by LDK structures throughout Kosovo, while coalition parties' candidates ( The AKR, the Alternatives, at the gatherings put <x0 with hands in their pockets”, were privileged both to book seats in the front ranks and in their speeches before the electorate, which 99% was LDK. Even during their speeches, they surrendered to President Rugova's head becoming more Rogogues, than we LDK candidates, so with their popular speeches, they tried to manipulate and bring in LDK sympathies. And there were even some electoral gatherings (such as the Somanic, Ferizaj, and so on) their candidates, who played some kind of tag song, because such parties are also made up of candidates.

Not only that, but after the outcome of the vote, until the re-counting and certificate process of votes continued, the AKR representative came out with the statement, that the AKR had to have more than four deputies in the Assembly, but the LDK had stolen the votes from their candidates. This shows that they don't trust the LDK, so how can the coalition be established on a common electoral list, respectively, with those who don't trust us, and in the last election our slogan was dealt with.

After the certificate of election results of 2017, when negotiations began between parliamentary parties for government creation, instead of the LDK being an important factor in these negotiations, the AKR immediately withdrew its deputies from the LDK parliamentary group and began blackmailing respectively to send ultimatums to LDK address. Ultimating nature “if you are not declared again this week, we enter into a coalition with PAN”, and indeed it happened, the AKR, which had entered the Assembly with the vote of the LDK electorate, entered into a coalition with PAN, making a great political “patiacre and that, with only two (later one) MPs, succeeded six ministerial seats (a deputy prime minister and five). This way AKR, on one side rules out the possibility of creating government coalition. The LDK-VVV (which after those elections was the desired coalition by the majority of Kosovo citizens) and on the other side politically defracitizes LDK, so simply the “secri on the ground”;

It should also be noted that in the same year (2017) in the municipal elections for Pristina, AKR members, structures and sympathies were listed on the wing of Shpend Ahmeti VV's, helping him win the election race against Arba Abrash, who was the LDK candidate. At the worst of all this was that Arban in this election lost the race for only 300-400 votes, which means that if it didn't help the Shpend, he would never be able to defeat Arbani;

Another argument against the LDK coalition- The AKR, is the fact that when the LDK's results are looked at and compared in all national elections, then it is seen that the smallest number of MPs in the Assembly, and only 22 deputies, had it, in the sixth legislature (of 2017), following elections in which it was in coalition with AKR;

So in view of the high facts highlighted, as well as the recent flows within the LDK, I think that LDK in the February 2021 elections has to compete alone, so it has to come out as the only one to measure in electoral balance, to see how much political developments (the two governments and divisions within the LDK) have affected between two parties of the elections. It is understandable if you mark better results than in the last elections, which the LDK wants from the heart, then it will be rewarded and adorned by the Creators of these developments, and if the satisfactory result is not achieved then not to be used by the pre-election coalition (with the AKR) as the alibi for coverage of failure, but to bring political responsibility to an expression