Hooper insists on Thaci's release: Can't be compared to Karagiqi a nominated Nobel

Thaci's lawyer has named the “for fraud and selective” for the specialised Prosecutor's Office parachutes over the request for issuing the warrant to arrest Thaci and keeping him in custody.

The “is an indication feature of the SPS response that the SPS has repeatedly contained in its claims has mispronounced and badly characterised the basic evidence and deliberately removed the key evidence in making its prefix”, said Hooper's response,

He has given particular importance to the SPS's claim to compare Thaci with the notorious Serbian politician Radovan Karadzic, who was sentenced to genocide to life imprisonment by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Hooper has said he regrets Thaci's comparison with Karadzic, citing the fact that Thaci surrendered voluntarily to the Special Court.

The SPS's showing is unfortunate by drawing comparison to other internationally recognised configurations using their resources to evade justice. [...] Unlike the presidents Habré, Karadzic and Taylor, who after learning the confirmation of the charges against them escaped, Mr. Thaci, when he learned that the indictment against him had been confirmed immediately resigned as president of Kosovo and handed over to the DHSK”, is said in the material Hooper has handed over to the tribunal.

The English lawyer has cited Thaci's commitment “to the reconciliation of various ethnicities in Kosovo”, saying he was nominated to win the Nobel Peace Prize.

“This is a civil right that is offered to each accused, including that, until the day of arrest, was respected President with a commitment to peace and stability a nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, who is now accused of committing crimes 22 years ago”, has written Hooper in the parliament.

He considers that the prosecution's evidence relates to many events taken out of context.

“Sic is discussed in the initial application and below, SPS-backed XMPs have to deal with many events taken out of context and have not been improperly explained or presented”, the defence building says.

Hooper writes that Thaci's deprivation from freedom cannot be argued with the warning that he “could be sentenced to life imprisonment”.

The court will accept that the deprivation of an individual from his freedom is a serious decision even after a sentence of”, says Thaci's lawyer, while also giving answers to the prosecution's claims on the danger that former political director of the government The KLA escaped.

<x)

He has also countered SPS claims that Thaci had no choice but to surrender, saying that the SPS contradicts itself with this.

Mr. Thaci had no choice but to surrender is unreasonable and untrue. For the purpose of this argument, the ZPS easily abandons the notion that it has the resources of an effective, wide network of” available, the lawyer's responses are said.

Thaci's defence says the prosecution has deceived the court, as it says the material, “Thaci had other elections”, besides surrender.

President Thaci acted responsibly and with due respect for the DHSK authority. He had a choice. He chose to surrender and not rely on his immunity”, Hooper writes.

The lawyer also has answers to the importance that the SPS in its claims has given Thaci's letter to US Secretary of State Mike Pompeii. Hooper says part of the letter was misquoted.

“On letter Z. Pompeo estimates Mr. Thaci for his personal commitment to the exact negotiations and the adoption of the structure and regulations of Court”, writes Hoober, while remembering that a meeting between the two had followed.

The “Letra was sent on January 21st 2020. It was followed by a February meeting between Mr. Pompeii and President Thaci, in which it was clear that the US government perceived Mr. Thaci as an important partner in following its policies to support DHSK and peace in area”, the lawyer adds.

He values high and replays Thaci's role in establishing the Special Court, considering that it “would not have existed
without”.

“must repeat that Z. Thaci supported him The DHSK would never have existed without him. For years his support may have changed: the court did nothing for several years and was criticised by several acts, which Mr. Thaci questioned the need or interest of such an institution. This is different from obstructing justice”, the Express reportedly broadcast.

The English lawyer has also listed cases when Thaci has come to the defense of various Serbian citizens and victims of this community in Kosovo, citing the case when Thaci had condemned the grave damage of a Serbian woman, and then writing about dozens of duties that as president, Thaci had made Serbs killed in Kosovo during and after the war.

“Homaze for Serb victims in Kosovo: As the president of Kosovo, Mr. Thaci visited specific monuments of Serbs in Kosovo and paid tribute to Kosovo Serbs killed during and after the war in Kosovo, calling for justice for all victims of war; Mr. Thaci angered many people in Kosovo”, the material said.

In the end, the lawyer wants the Special Court to accept Thaci's request for provisional release under any conditions considered necessary and appropriate.