4 hours agoHaxhiu Albulen: Albin Kurt and I are not barred from running into elections
Periskopi(5 years ago)
(5 years ago)VVA's Albulen Haxhiu has spoken of the Constitutional Court's decision. He calls part of that decision absurd. Invited to show “DPS at Fidan” in T7 she has said that she and Albin Kurti are not barred from running into elections. To flee the confrontation that a scandal has occurred in Kosovo. Seven months [...]
Invited to show “DPS at Fidan” in T7 she has said that she and Albin Kurti are not barred from running into elections.
To flee the confrontation that a scandal has occurred in Kosovo. Seven months and it's still going on because the Constitutional Court's absurdity -- except we assess the Constitutional Court's decision -- because what we've said since June 3rd, but that the Constitutional Court's absurdity is stressing that the government has not been elected but says it will remain in office until the new government. How come. A government that has not been elected to the Assembly, as may remain in office”, Haxhiu says.
“We are obliged to respect the Constitutional decision”, she adds.
Instead of dealing with the damage caused during this time by a government, they deal with the issue of not being fair or failing to run Albin Kurti or me to be part of the VVA list. I say there's been a lot of voices in this direction. Many citizens are concerned”, Haxhi stressed.
Our “interpretation is clear and based also on the penal code of the Republic of Kosovo. And in the law of general choice. Neither I nor Mr. Kurti has no obstacle, and I say that with full conviction based on the analysis and legal arguments consulted within VV) and not only”, Haxhi said.
In this direction we are not forbidden. There is no legal or constitutional obstacle to our failure to run”, she explained.
She's cleared up her reasons.
I'll have Mr. “and Mr. Kurt was sentenced in 2018 and we were sentenced on parole. In 2018 the old 2013 Penal Code was in effect, and the parole sentence had no legal consequences. So the court charges a person accused of criminal offense, in this case you know we've been convicted of tear gas, but it's not punishment, it's a threat that the court gives to someone in order that within the verifiable period, we've had a two-year period of verifibility, not to commit criminal acts. We have not committed criminal acts within the verifiating period”, she explained.
