Former Constitutional Judge: President Osmani has the right to intervene in CEC decisions

A reaction came from President Vjosa Osmani's U.d., who asked the CEC to reconsider that decision.

This decision, specifically its IV point, can create circumstances under which the vote's right is flagrantly violated”, Osmani wrote among other things.

But under the Law for Elections, the Central Election Commission does not submit to the complaint, in this case Vjosa Osmani letter.

The Commission's “63.6 ruling does not submit to the complaint unless clearly provided by this law.”, says Article 63, of making decisions.

Meanwhile, former Constitutional Court Judge Kadri Kryeziu for Periscope has clarified whether it can be seen as Vjosa Osman's intervention to the CEC.

Kryeziu has said Osmani has the right to seek clarification, but has no right to interfere with decisions made by the CEC.

“The head of the CEC is nominated by the president of the state, and the president is tasked with doing some outside control of the CEC, how much I noticed, according to Article 84 of the Constitution, there is the President's competency for the CEC, he has the potential to seek clarification, has the right to request clarification, and the CEC should give written clarifications for the decisions he made, but no longer interferes with the decisions because the CEC is independent institution and the rulings have independent of<1> have said Perisco.

Whether the CEC will reconsider the decision to verify votes from the Diaspora by phone calls is unknown.

Otherwise, extraordinary elections will be held on February 14th./Periscopi/

CEC for the Diaspora vote: Every exile not answering the phone is not allowed to vote