7 hours agoArrest measure imposed against suspects for attempted serious murder
Periskopi(5 years ago)
(5 years ago)The Foundation Court in Pec .T. has approved the request of the Founding Prosecutor in Pec for the appointment of the detention measure to L.T. defendants for the serious attempted murder, as the Court reports, at 14.08.20, around 21:34, in Kline, at the playground parking lot, on purpose [...]
As the Court reports, on the 1408.20 ' s, around 21:34, in Cline, in the park park of the games, deliberately and deliberately due to the immediate disagreement and physical clashes between defendants and the injured, defendants have attempted to deprive the life of those injured in that way, defendants pull out knives and strike injuries by causing bodily injuries that were at the moment dangerous for life and then escape from the scene, while the injured are sent to the hospital for first aid delivery.
With these actions, defendants S.T. and L.T. are suspected to have committed a major murder attempted by Article 173 par.1 points 1.11 linked to KPRK's 28th article.
The defendants S.T has been assigned detention measures of 16.08.20, while the defendant L.T has been elusive for justice organs until the 1501.2021 date when he was arrested and brought before the tribunal and the same has been assigned the detention measure in length of (1) months since the court deemed there is doubt that the defendant had committed the criminal work of which he allegedly committed and that during the investigative procedure two defendants who are brothers will be prosecuted, so that with the finding possible defendants in the freedom there is a possibility that the same can co-ordination and the protection of their witnesses as they can influence the change of their statements or the use of abuse of criminal responsibility, as well as well as well as well as well as possible, and other witnesses who are still do. The court, the appointment of the detention measure, even considering the weight of the criminal offense, the way it was committed, and the fact that the commission of the criminal act was carried out in a country where at the moment the prosecution was amassed a large number of people, as well as in view of the exasperated reports with the injured, indicate the existence of real danger that with possible finding the defendant at freedom, the same could end the act attempted criminal or perform some work of the same nature.
The court praised other alternative measures for the security of the defendant's presence in the procedure, but it estimated that no alternative measure would be adequate at the stage of the procedure.
Against this decision the dissatisfied side has right to complaint at the Court of Appeals.
