The VV's act calls on us to betray America, and to think about which superpower to become

Even Arber Zami from Vetevendosje has commented on the US clash with their leader, Albin Kurti, calling for disobedience to our ally country. Zaimi considers that the Superpowers operate with the <x0-raditional cold-bloodedness for the advancement of its global interests”, though such a thing cannot be said of the US in 1999 when it initiated shelling [...]
Zaimi considers that the Superpowers operate with the <x0-raditional cold-bloodedness for advancing its global interests”, though such a thing cannot be said of the US in 1999 when it initiated bombings on the Serbian Army in Kosovo and Serbia.
Let's get rid of illusions and study the game coolly. We're too poor and too young to claim loyalty.
Zaimi goes further, saying superpowers should not be thought of as perfect “macine” and that carefully think of which group to back. In fact, Kosovars have actually been away from more pro-Americans than pro-Russian or pro-kinese in their alignment with superpowers.
This review of the American role in Kosovo comes after Mr. Richard Green to Mr. Albin Kurti. /Periscope
Full status:
The superpower is superpower because it acts with cool rationality to advance its global interests. Not because of individual sentimentalisms, such as <x0) eternal friendship”, “joint idealistic” and so on. Anyone who doesn't understand that doesn't understand why. In World War II, English and Americans made no alliance with Berlin but with Moscow. We already know that it wasn't German racism, because the eugenic and racist ideas in Germany had come from the United States, and no inhuman violence, because Russia didn't lose the latter either. And of course, it wasn't Roosevelt's pro-communist sympathy or Churchill's.
The reason was like any dozen years after the war, George F. Kennan is a vital interest of the United States not to allow the dominance of the Euro-Asian continent by a single power, neither in the sea sense, nor in the land.
A similar reasoning, on the part of Berlin and Moscow, explains the Molotov-Ribendrop pact (the two sides saw as greater risk of Americans than each other), and analog reasonings explain the tenderness of the powers towards Hitler, when it invaded Czechoslovakia (because they thought Russia was the most powerful enemy), or the subsequent opening of the West to China (to separate from Russia), or late, the attempt to open America to Russia (to pull it out of China) as an approach to internal Europe's internal structure. The superpower's greatest enemy is always the second country's superpower, and we do not rarely have the country's first co-operation with fourth countries, against second and third.
This alliance of first with fourth and fifth against third and second shocks sentimental thinkers, because they tend to believe that the superpowers “maintain promises”, “maintain friendships”, “respect international rule”, “respect alliances”. Since the third and second countries differ much more frequently than the first country (the absolute refugee is changed only with global wars), promises are not kept, friendships are changed, international order is violated, alliances are dissolved and reformed. To be sovereign means to do just that to make your own law above the law.
Where do we remain, the little ones, in this great game?
First, remove illusions and study the game coolly. We are too poor and too young to claim loyalty.
Second, work to increase our relative weight. If we become a regional factor, at least the region will take us into account. That means economic, territorial-demographic, and military dimension. It implies first and urgently (but this is the most difficult) co-ordination of Albania and Kosovo, beyond Edi Rama's folk spectacles with Hashims, the Islands and Ramush. Then organization of the diaspora for lobbi, structure of the economy efficiently, avoiding corruption, oligarchs that stifle competition, and non-productive investments, such as those in construction, asphalt or cafes and hotels. It also means serious investment in the military, and the regional alliance against the already dominant factor in our region, which is Serbia.
Shh. If the Adriatic connection project is presented to us in Belgrade, we should challenge it by bringing alternative projects: connecting the Adriatic with the Black Sea, as well as the coastal corridor connecting Albania with Croatia and Slovenia.
Third, even superpowers themselves should not be perceived as perfect machines (such as nonexistence). They themselves stand up international order, however, within them the clashes of interest groups and public opinion operate. It should be carefully chosen which group and how supported, and which messages can be sent to which parts of the public opinion there. Various diasporas, from the Hebrew to the Irish, from the Greek and Armenian to the Polish, have known to create a favorable moment within the superpowers for the benefit of the state of origin. That means long, constant, multidirectional work. Patriotic education in the home of new generations, then professional specialisation abroad, hoping that wherever it works in the future of any citizenship, to have the sense of mission and duty towards the homeland. It means long-term orientation in diaspora and instead of origin, and humility in the face of mission, not arrogance “I caught the top of meeting Lord X on his yacht”.
Can we do it? There's no other way.












