VV: Washington agreement does not exclude knives in final dialogue

The agreement signed at the White House by the Kosovo and Serbian sides, Vetevendosje is calling it concession and compromise on the part of Kosovo for Serbia. Vetevendosje spokesman Progress Kryeziu says this process did not bring bilateral recognition as it had promised, but has offered it even closer to Serbia, [...]
The agreement signed at the White House by the Kosovo and Serbian sides, Vetevendosje is calling it concession and compromise on the part of Kosovo for Serbia.
Vetevendosje spokesman Progress Kryeziu says this process did not bring bilateral recognition as it had promised, but has offered it even closer to Serbia, while adding that the VV considers this agreement harmful.
He also spoke of Vetevendosje claims “thic on map”.
This process, like those of the past, began without preparation, without principles, without clear goals and subsequently ended with concessions and compromises on the part of Kosovo in relation to Serbia. It did not bring mutual recognition, which was a promise that the entire delegation -- and this government did it before starting on this trip -- let alone that it did not recognise, but only brought Serbia closer to Kosovo”, Kryeziu said.
Kryeziu at a media conference said Kosovo became the subject of this meeting in Washington rather than that it was a party.
Being both early and in this process and these talks once again spoke of the internal issues of the Republic of Kosovo, where once again Kosovo became the subject of what was the party starting with the fact that under this document Kosovo has agreed to do the joint exploitation of Lake Weyman, which is the wealth and property of Kosovo. On the other hand, it agreed to suspend its membership efforts in international organisations that are in conflict with the constitution of the Republic of Kosovo itself, Article 17 respectively, and also against Kosovo's declaration of Independence itself, Article 9 which aims to have Kosovo joined the international organisation”, the potencoi Kryeziu, respectively.
On the other hand, Kryeziu has also commented on the point of the deal involving the mini-Sengen, until he has called it scandalous how it was not discussed the damage to the war that Serbia caused.
The “also agreed on the mini-sengen project, which is exclusively an idea that suits Serbia mostly, despite those who signed this agreement have been powerful opponents of this idea. While also without price, the historic effort for access to the Adriatic Sea enabled Serbia by offering road and railway infrastructure at this point. And in this agreement, which was called for the normalization of the economy, only 4 or 5 points are related to the economy. They were not mentioned for a moment, nor were the damages of war, and it is scandalous in itself how the normalisation of the economy can be without addressing these questions”, Kryeziu stressed.
While the former claims of Vetevendosje “thic on map”, he said this agreement allows space for even in the near future to have knives.
“Concern for the possibility of the rock of territories that is only eunism for partitioning Kosovo is a concern based on the already witnessed by the mediator's statements. In the process in Washington, Yerenelli as well as Bolton. Our concern is based, this as the idea and project has existed, and there is no evidence that the same cannot be restored since negotiations with Serbia will continue, new concessions will occur. The avoidance of a serious injury at a certain point does not justify the same amount of damage. The fact that it wasn't discussed territories this time doesn't mean it's not harmful that it was discussed about the Romanian mini-sengen of the Adriatic Sea corridor for Serbia and the suspension of our citizenship for at least one year”, the Kryeziu potential.
The mayor said that Vetevendosje considers this agreement harmful and that I will continue to oppose it in any institution that will be discussed, since, as Kryeziu stressed, only Serbia's demands in this agreement have been accommodated and addressed in relation to Kosovo and not vice versa.
As for the September 7th meeting in Brussels, he said this meeting is also followed by transparency like Washington's.











