Constitutional court decides not to return confiscated property to Hysri Pecan

Hysri Pecani, who is also known in the opinion as “Burdushi”, has received negative answers from the Constitutional Court following his complaint about Prizren's Constitutional Court's decision on the seizure of property.

Pecan had claimed to have been violated before the Law for Equality.

However, such a Burdush request has been declared unacceptable and has been rejected.

“Bunding Subject: KI 226/19 Forger: Hysri Pecani object to the question of demand was the assessment of the constitutionality of the Constitution of the Constitutional Court Act in Prizren [P.N.1191/19], dated November 8, 2019, of the Constitutional Court in Prizren [Ppr. No.487/2018], dated August 8, 2019 and the Order of the Foundation Court in Prizren for a long-term ban on wealth [Ppr. No. 487/2018, dated August 14th 2019”, is said in the media communiqué.

Also, this communiqué reportedly claimed that the forger of the request claimed that with contested acts he was violated by his guaranteed rights with Article 24 [Barazia prior to the Law] of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo.

The request was based on paragraph 1 and 7 of Article 113. [Juridication and Authorised Palaces] of the Constitution, on Article 22 [Procedure Procedure] 47 [Invitive Request] of Law No. 03 L-21 for Constitutional Court, and rule 32 [Presenting requests and responses] of the Constitutional Court's work regulation. The review college proposed that, in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 7 of Article 113 of the Constitution, with Article 20 and 47.2 of the Constitutional Court Law and in accordance with rules 39 (1)Ab) and 59 (2) of the work regulation, the request to be declared unacceptable” is said in communiqué.