Charge: If the evidence is stemming from the special, the chief prosecutor should resign

The Kerinni has stressed that if evidence is proven to be derived from the Procrouse Office, there must be resignations.

If proven, if the investigation proves that the evidence is derived from the Special Court and Special Chambers, the Prosecutor's Office, then not the deputy prosecutor, but the chief prosecutor should resign. Because it's a violation of the integrity of procedures and the reliability of evidence”, the lawyer has declared it.

The order has further clarified that if confidential documents are published, someone could also assume criminal responsibility.

There is a regulation to preserve the confidential document, the indictment is a confidential document until the same is confirmed and the defendants delivered. It is unfair and unusual for the defendant to be informed of the indictment through the media. So someone take responsibility, even criminal responsibility, because the person in charge of keeping classified documentation hasn't done well, Qerkin said in Frontal.

But he specified that to have criminal responsibility, any person employed in the Special Chambers must be responsible for the release of evidence.

If this evidence has come out of the Serbian Prosecution, officials of the Specialised Chambers will not take responsibility, according to Kerin.