Maliqi: Hoti government opposite “cunam”

Political analyst Shkelzen Maliqi has declared that the Hoti government faces a devastating multidimensional tsunami. He has said that when the circumstances of dialogue with Serbia and the major problems that are bringing to the pandemic are taken into account, the position of this government is hopeless. In this interview given the newspaper “The new age”, he said [...]
He has estimated that from this tsunami, neither the critics of this government will be able to escape.
Maliqi has declared that the political spectrum will have to be unified to face the challenges Kosovo is facing. In this look, all the mud of criticism can be discarded, Avdullah Hoti, but actually the tsunami in question will hit all the participants in history and hysteria we've been experiencing in recent months and years. We see the woe of this situation in the behaviour of Kosovo Assembly deputies and political parties that are unable to overcome party interests, resentments, resentments, etc. What enables the necessary mobilization of all to protect us from the dangers we face, he stated. According to Maliqi, in this situation LV leader Albin Kurti is playing with a dangerous card. “No one seems sincere in statements and performances. And for more, the alignments are weird, with the lenses. If you get along well, both the fragile government coalition and the opposition are acting both with puppet control mechanisms”, Maliqi has declared.
“ Mr. Maliqi, what is your assessment of the government's work, Hoti?
Maliqi: Not only is Hoti's objective assessment of the government's work in the beginning (usually governments are given a reasonable deadline to show their skills and performance), and in this case, relevant external circumstances for assessment, which have been responsible for its hasty creation but are now viewed with scepticism. I mean, for the main motive of rushing, the need for continuing dialogue with Serbia, as a priority of the American administration, which also led to the departure of Kurti government, and now, when the government corrected the issue and opened the dialogue, we are witnessing that its promising moment seems gone and that we are back in the tracks that this dialogue has remained blocked before. Adding to this is the pandemic crisis, which in the meantime became fungi, on the one hand, as well as the serious threat of the country's economic collapse, on the other hand, seems to be the position of the government Hoti is hopeless, standing as a negligible dam in the face of the devastating multidimensional tsunami. In this look, the whole mud of criticism can be taken Avdullah Hoti, but in fact, the tsunami in question will hit all the participants in history and hysteria we are experiencing in recent months and years. We see the woe of this situation in the behaviour of Kosovo's Parliament deputies and political parties that are unable to overcome party interests, resentments, resentments, etc. What enables the necessary mobilization of all to protect us from the dangers we face. Prime Minister Hoti even when he tries to join forces, no one is likely to do so. Meanwhile, Albin Kurti is playing on a dangerous card of victory of the absolute majority in the upcoming election.
“ Criticals to this government have also been added by coalition partners, especially for Prime Minister Hoti's approach to Kosovo dialogue Serbia and the management of pandemic. How have you seen these criticisms?
Maliqi: They look like part of the misery of our policy I described earlier. The government has also been created with crutches, can barely stand, and now they want to keep pace. Critics are afraid of the failure of dialogue and the struggle with pandemic, so they want to secure a distance of a pre-election campaign. No one's looking honest at statements and performance. And for more, the alignments are weird, with the lenses. If you get along well, both the fragile government coalition and the opposition are acting both with puppet control mechanisms. Kosovo's policymakers and winemakers have been dragged back to the rear from where the processes command, while forward they push the subordinates to confronting the problems and duplications of the processes. This is especially true of dialogue that is not yet known as the target, of ending with mutual recognition.
“ As it is seen so far, even this government will deal intensively with dialogue with Serbia. The prime minister has said the drafting of the final agreement with Serbia has begun. Does this government have the capacity to complete this process?
Maliqi: There are doubts in the government's capacities to reach the final agreement, but also about international circumstances for it to be reached. Skender Hysen's trip to Washington will probably clear things up and get nervous, make it clear that we are at the critical point of the final agreement, or be realistic about a longer-term process. Proposal of the agreement is the normal process of starting all important agreements. And, one could have been at the last meeting in Brussels, but they are measuring the pulse of both sides as ready for eventual compromises.
“ At this stage, we have not seen any very active US participation in the Brussels dialogue. Do you expect any greater involvement of the United States in the process?
Maliqi: I think we're now entering a phase where the US will be active, but as a remote factor, not direct negotiation. Actually Granelli also said, after the Washington summit failed on June 27th, that the US intends to hold the economic negotiation table, while the political ones belong to the EU, since Kosovo and Serbia are aiming at EU integration. This strategy is not random, but intended to eliminate Russia's entry into negotiations. If the US were part of the table with the EU, Serbia would seek Russia's presence, as has been the formula for previous tables. I believe the US and Russia will negotiate at other levels, while the EU will prove the reach of the final agreement between Kosovo and Serbia, always supervised by the US.
“ For any significant vote in the Assembly, the ruling coalition is needing the opposition votes. How long do you think this government can last, or do you expect an expansion of this coalition?
Maliqi: I think at some point critical, if the government needs numbers against the potential motion of distrust, The PDK can keep the Hoti government in power if negotiations with Serbia are conducted with positive or promising directions. And so, The PDK, as a party with the role ofkingmaker, will make sure the country does not go into early elections when it does not convert it and other parties in government, unless, in the meantime, progress occurs in reports between the PDK and LV, at least removing the red line of evental co-operation. But I don't see that there are signs like this while the LV fuels the conviction of the big victory over the old “geopolitical”, where it puts all parties, except itself.











