7 minutes agoRaka shows whether a person from the Coronervirus can be touched twice
Periskopi(6 years ago)
(6 years ago)Petrit Bylykbashi of Pristina has returned to the Coronobritus. Although he had recovered three months ago, after showing symptoms he was tested again and has resulted in positive results. After that, microbiologist Lull Raka has reacted, which has the main assumptions of restoring the virus. Through a post in his Facebook account, Raka said [...]
Through a post in his Facebook account, Raka said that a possible cause is mistakes in the laboratory.
A possible cause is human error in the laboratory. The string of nanofaring or gluttons used for diagnosis can produce various amounts of the virus, depending on where the failure is made and how it is made. Labal error is transmitted with false positive or negative results”, Raka wrote.
According to Raka, to actually prove the reinfectation and to distinguish it from the long-term extraction of the virus that continues from the first infection, it must become the sequence of both patient samples.
By this method it can prove that there are genetically different viruses in the same patient. Likewise, symptoms and duration of reinfluence should be transmitted. Influenza and infection with the synthetic virus (VRS), there are two recurring diseases. The VRS may even occur several times within a 15x2 winter season, he wrote.
Meanwhile, the third assumption is reserved in the human body.
By this option, the virus has never been removed from the body and this is its continuation. The patient has prolonged sporadic extraction of viral ARN. Like. In the cells, the virus has been found 33 days after the infection, but has not been found in the respiratory leaflet”, it says in its post. /
