Judgment against Pristina municipality officials charged with illegal expropriations fails

While due to the situation with the David-19 pandemic, the same announced that the session would be postponed indefinitely.

Unlike the previous session, held on 24 June 2020, two injured naim Rrustemi and Ilir Rama, who had declared that the Pristina municipality had illegally decoupled their property by exceeding their municipal-owned property without meeting the legal conditions, reports the “Bet on Justice”.

According to the indictment compiled on November 15, 2018, the three accused had signed their signatures on the parade of October 28, 2014, compiled by the accused Bajqmeti, senior government owner of ownership and distribution at the Directorate of Finance and Property in the Pristina municipality, while accused Visar Berisha, in quality of director of the Finance Directorate and Property, and Sedin Thaqi, in quality of the chief of property sector in this director, had expressed common reconciliation with the Bymeti, who is required to take the financial station in Kosovo's Central Bank's firm on behalf of the Paris Bank of Bank, has compensation for Paris. 756-5, the Cadastral Zone, Matiqa, according to the Communist chairman's decision of June 27, 2013.

Also, it is said that with the November 11, 2014, the two co-contained Visar Berisha and Shemsedin Thaqi signing their signatures on the request of the accused Byqmeti have expressed full shared reconciliation with him to also take place in the cadastral opera of parts of cadastral parcels No.754-2, No. 756-12, 756-13, 756-5 ,756-4 and 756-8, the Matiqa zone, in the name of the Pristina municipality, according to final decisions of June 27th 2013 and July 22, 2013, with which decisions were adopted exhumation of the parcels according to the lists attached to those decisions “for achieving the purpose and legitimate public profit<1>, which under the regulatory plan <x2M> 1x3> was pre-resultation of the building project <x-25> and why the document has been affected by social property, but that has not been met by the legal property of the Parliament, and that is the correcting of the three-deposentsumments of the property, as the three.

This, according to the indictment, was because the full payment of expropriation had not been made as a condition for later cadastral changes in property delivery, but 370 thousand euros from the Pristina municipality were deposited, on the record of trust on behalf of those injured in the CEC, on October 29, 2014, where the interest of 7%, which is said to total about 50 thousand euros, was not calculated.