Serwer: Let's wait for what happens in Washington.

US professor of “John Hopkins University” and expert on issues related to the Western Balkans Daniel Serwer, says he will be happy if the June 27th meeting in Washington between Kosovo and Serbia were discussed economic problems between the two states. So Cerwer said in a written answer to [...]
US professor of “John Hopkins University” and expert on issues related to the Western Balkans Daniel Serwer, says he will be happy if the June 27th meeting in Washington between Kosovo and Serbia were discussed economic problems between the two states.
So Serwer said in a written answer to the Journal Express, asked about topics to be discussed at the White House.
“will be happy to see the focus of meetings in Washington being economic issues, non-tariff trade barriers, as well as non-compliance agreements not implemented between Belgrade and Pristina. You should ask the presidents if they are traveling for such a purpose. Green says yes.”
The American Esperie, meanwhile, views it as an expression of the good cast for trust building, the fact that Kosovo and Serbia have given up certain attitudes and goals on the eve of travel to Washington.
According to him, Serbia would have to lobby for Kosovo's membership in international organisations if it wanted to show good neighbourly relations.
“Suspension of the recognition campaign and that about seeking membership in international organisations are actions for building trust with few consequences, as long as it is said it will last until the meeting (of Washington). I don't think extending them would be a good idea. If Serbia wants to demonstrate friendly neighbourhoods, it should sponsor Kosovo for membership in international organisations”, the American professor has added further.
Asked about Vuciki's meeting with Vladimir Putin in Moscow a day before the trip to Washington and about whether the preliminary developments expose Greenell's statements for a “meeting for Economy” at the White House, Cerwer says that one such thing should be asked Vuciq.
Until he adds that lining Moscow's side against the West is nothing new and that it is a classic tactic of Serbia, however, that he says he stands in the way of EU membership.
You should ask President Vuciq. He is constantly making it clear that he will not abandon his comfort with Putin in favour of a alignment along the West. The game with Moscow against the West is a classic protection behavior that will prevent Serbia from membership in the European Union.
As for the latest Yerenelli statements that the idea of correcting the Quakers was John Bolton's policy rather than President Trump's, Cerwer says that perhaps such an attitude indicates that Trump's emissary understood that Kosovo's movement of borders and partition was a bad idea.
However, it says that it should be expected to see what will happen at the June 27th meeting in Washington, since, according to him, Trump's administre is not known for telling the truth.
I think that maybe Green realized that separation was a bad idea, which would be good if it was true. But truth is not the value of this administration. We'll have to wait and see what the meeting in Washington<x1... is over, Serwer.











