British microbiologist: There is no evidence to prove a second wave of coronary

According to him, the idea of restoring a second wave of Ovid 19 is based on outdated flu patterns. Scientists have repeatedly referred to the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918.

The flu's “Virus has a peak, then it descends and then it has second waves and even thirds. The flu is not a good model because this virus behaves differently. I'm skeptical of the second wave. There were no second waves similar to COVID-19 in China, South Korea or New Zealand, he said.

The flu is biologically different from the coronary and should not be comparable, Professor Pennington added.

The microbiologist also questioned the effectiveness of the deadlock. He told the media that if the impasse had been so great, we would have had fewer cases.

That statement Pennington made after the British government was forced to withdraw claims that easing the restrictive measures in England would inevitably bring “to an increase in cases.

Meanwhile, many experts have agreed in a belief that infection is forced to resurface in a second wave in the absence of a vaccine.

The biggest fear is that the second wave will occur during the winter and coincide with the flu season, and there may be chaos in hospitals again.

Professor Pennington, however, said the evidence to support these claims is very weak.