Polaska: Venice Commission realised that outgoing government was misusing it to intervene in the work of Constitution

Lawyer Dastid Pallaska, through a Facebook text, says the Venice Commission in the letter to Kurti, told him he did not intervene in the Constitutional Court.

Here's a full note:

As is expected by an international organisation that respects rule of law and democracy, the Venice Commission's response to the government's outgoing demand is extremely clear.

First, they let the government know that the request was rejected in a way U n NANIM because it does not concern the assessment of international standards, but with an assessment of the constitutionality of a presidential decree that is in the exclusive competence of the Constitutional Court.

The second, he reproves the outgoing government for trying to include the Venice Commission in a case that has been brought before the Constitutional Court, warning that the inclusion of the Venice Commission in the case would CENUTE the authority of the Constitutional Court.

Third, express B The State Commission's full implementation that the Constitutional Court will provide satisfactory solutions to the issue raised.

In other words, the Venice Commission has realized that the government's only goal in flight was to misuse the Venice Commission to intervene in the work of the Constitutional Court.

Clearly, the description of the Venice Commission's response in the outgoing prime minister's press communiqué is completely inaccurate.