Kurt once praised the Constitutional Judges, today he calls them captured

It was in 2008 that Kurt had written big words for the judges of this court, who also opposed the government's decision to increase their salaries.

The government doesn't want a Law on Government, so it can be based on a regulation, as it violates the Constitution. Constitutional Court judges Almiro Rodriguez and Gresa Caka-Niman were right in their 14-page non-recognitional opinion when they rejected the government's decision to raise their own salaries”, Kurti wrote in 2008.

While, following the ruling that the Constitutional Court published, Kurti did not hesitate to address serious charges in their direction by telling Thaci's fans, and refusing to accept that decision.

“Formulations type “... The court stresses that it is self-aware, that this “consultation” formal, should be completed as soon as possible and included in itself the demand for fast dynamic interaction”, or, “the right to propose the terminator for prime minister is both responsibility and 31x6> constitutes examples of the creativity of the Constitutional Court judges in expressing their admiration for the country's president's decisions, when he wrote in Facebook after the decision of Thaci.

Here are the full statements of Kurt in 2018, and this one:

Kurt 20 December 2018:

Today it was a year since Prime Minister Haradinaj and his government doubled their salaries for themselves. Tomorrow, as the agenda at the plenary session, there is also the principled vote of the Budget Bill for 2019. What is the meaning of the Assembly's approval of the budget proposed by a government that increased its wages even with a retroactive effect? The government doesn't want a Law for Government, so it can be based on Order, as it violates the Constitution.

Constitutional Court judges Almiro Rodriguez and Gresa Caka-Niman were right in their joint non-recognitional 14-page opinion when they rejected the government's decision to increase their salaries. Here are two conclusions:

66. We conclude that decision no. 04/20 of the Government of the Republic of Kosovo, on December 20th 2017, is not in line with the constitution's articles 92 and 93, because neither does “implement a” law, nor is it a “proposation”.

67. Then we conclude that, in turn, the No. The Government of the Republic of Kosovo's 04/20 on December 20, 2017, violates the competencies of the Convention defined in Article 65.5 of the Constitution, thus infecting the balance and division of powers defined by Article 4 of the Constitution.

The government had no legal basis, fell contrary to the law, and violated the Assembly.

Raising yourself is stealing. Because stealing is not stealing because it's sneaky, but because it's stealing. Every theft must be punished. And first the government.

It is necessary to raise wages in our country. But not those of heads of state and government. Meanwhile, the minimum wage in Kosovo remains 170 euros for all citizens over 35, and only 130 euros for those under that age!

Kurt's writing last night:

Last night, in the late hours, we received an announcement from the Constitutional Court regarding the Act on the President's unconstitutional decree.

Let's say from the beginning, that in text and subtex, there's not much on constitutional issues as with the unprecedented method of expressing disciplinary-disciplinary slogans.

Few or no cases can be found in the democratic world when the winner of elections and the government in office itself are ready for new elections, and this is impossible by the Constitutional Court and the president by being called to the Islamic majority in the Parliament and by turning down objective statements and causes such as the serious state of pandemic.

Instead of interpreting the Constitution, the Court seems to have this approach: since the president is right, let's try to reason.

The court has stressed that in 2010 and 2017, following successful no-confidence motions, there has been no will nor a majority in the Assembly to form a new Government, but how they have ascertained this is not known, since the distribution of the Assembly has been automatic.

It is true that the president has an absolute right to distribute the Parliament, but, for this very reason, it is limited to the no-confidence motion as a criterion.

The court has written the announcement in such a way as saying that the winner of the election does not exist at all, as if the winner is in existence. Meanwhile, on the other hand, the Court clears the difference between the dismissal and the executive resignation.

The court prejudges when it says the winner has not only proposed a candidate, but has not expressed interest in such a thing. This does not stand, because it is constantly stressed by us that the winner of the election is not hesitant or refusing.

In some cases the Court has been written down on rewrite of the Constitution, for example. points 13 and 18.

Formation of “type... The court stresses that it is self-continual, that this “consulsive” formal, should be completed as soon as possible and included in itself the demand for fast dynamic interaction”, or, “the right to propose the prime minister's mandate is both a responsibility and a privilege” constitute examples of the creativity of the Constitutional Court judges in expressing their admiration for the country's president's decisions.

A thorough and detailed assessment by our legal advisers will be possible after we receive the complete text of Action.

Unfortunately, the Constitutional Court was lined up with state-captives. She spoke of herself more and more than her case. She sealed herself, she depreciated herself.

Our battle continues, along with the conscious people, against this corrupt caste.

Finally, we have not really had high expectations for the Constitutional Court's decision, but this decision is beyond imagination and under every level. As an unjust person, he is unacceptable. For the next political steps, we will inform citizens in the coming days.

The Constitutional Court has decided yesterday in favour of President Hashim Thaci regarding the mandated appointment for the formation of the government.