What does the Constitutional Court's decision on Vetevendosje mean politically?

The Constitutional Court ruled on the controversial decree of President Thaci nominating Avdullah Hoti as the mandate of the new parliamentary majority. This decision already explains how our parliamentary parties will interact with each other after the elections. Under this decision, the Constitutional Court fully considers it in line with the Constitution of Kosovo [...]
Under this decision, Constitutional Court He considers Thaci's decision to mandate Mr. Hoti for the new government prime minister.
But this decision provides needed clarification and how it should be acted in the upcoming elections.
The LDK had consistently complained that Vetevendosje had been treated unfairly as a government partner. In fact, this party has had the same complaint against the PDK during the time of co-government with it.
But what did present-day Vetevendosje have in common with the former PDK? They came first in the election.
Through this decision, the Constitutional Court removes the possibility of the first party being held under control and blackmailing parties in co-governance with the collapse of government, writes Periscope.
In this form, voters of each Albanian parliamentary party manage to gain equality with each other in the form of their representation. The first parliamentary party has the exclusive right to the Parliament's chairman/chairman's proposal, but everything else is under discussion for agreement in proportion to parliamentary representation.
Under current circumstances, this decision implies that the first parties (in this case Vetevendosje) should honour agreements on co-governance with the government partner. Mr. Kurti and his party must definitely reach agreement with another parliamentary party if they do not win more than 61 MPs.
We remember that Vetevendosje had violated the agreement for co-government with the LDK by dismissing Agim Veliun, although that agreement prevented such a move. /Periscope











