a few seconds agoAmy: Libran Aliu's racist language seeks to show Vetevendosje as legitimate instance for the capture of the state
Periskopi(6 years ago)
(6 years ago)The philosophy researcher and the connoisseur of political affairs, Ridvan Emini, through a Facebook post, has analysed Vetevendosje Movement MP Lieburn Aliu's language as the latter attempts to reason on the appointments of Vetevendosje officials on board. Emini, through this post, says Aliu has used racist, insulting, and offensive languages [...]
The philosophy researcher and the connoisseur of political affairs, Ridvan Emini, through a Facebook post, has analysed Vetevendosje Movement MP Lieburn Aliu's language as the latter attempts to reason on the appointments of Vetevendosje officials on board.
Emini, through this post, says Aliu has used racist, insulting and insulting language against all those who are not militants of the Vetevendosje Movement.
He further says that apprehending boards cannot be reasoned with being a member of the Vetevendosje Movement, even says VV activists named on boards have become criminals until they have accepted such work without contract.
“Determination as a legitimate instance of capture and activist as a pre-legal institution is the last two inventions of Vetevendosje, and racist, insulting and lynching language is new.”, Emini said further.
Read Emin's full post:
The glorification of someone toward others has no name but racism. Racism may be present in social actions, practices, or political systems. Albin Kurti's figure has been elevated by activists of the Vetevendosje Movement for years under the name that this alone is the uncorrupted one and only this can best run the country. It's not enough just Albin, he needs to be surrounded by government activists on board.
Lieburn Aliu, one of the VV's leaders, at his attempt at justifying the capture of boards, is released in insulting and lynching language to racism. Libran, furthermore, tries to articulate self-determination activist with our linguistic superlative tones, contempting all normal people, in the sense of inadequacy and inadequacy to be professionally and academicly worthy.
The evidence that Vetevendosje activist, however a member, is nothing less than the rationale of the institutional “crime”. He says that the activist is not guilty of apprehending the state and corruption, as these are made by thieves, mercenaries, criminals, and not those who attack for an ideal, but Lieburn, these militants, have become thieves, mercenaries, and criminals when they have accepted such work without competition. Lieburn, the idealist of a great idea, would never have.
Lieburn, legitimizes being board director by being a member of Vetevendosje. Membership in Vetevendosje as the legitimate institution of capture of the state and activist as a pre-legal institution because of the alleged moral, professional and academic superiority is demagogi and racism.
Libran, angry until we get, argues the short period of militants in Vetevendosje with their posts, but forgets that the Law requires at least two years of political inactivity to be part of such boards. Lieburn, trying to protect the militants of Vetevendosje, despises, insults, and exercises racism against all other people, as unable and insufficient.
Vetevendosje as a legitimate instance of capture and activist as a sura-legal institution are the last two inventions of Vetevendosje, and racist, insulting and lynching language is nothing new.
