Thaci's adviser gives legal lecture to Abaz Kurt for classified information

President Thaci's political adviser, Adil Behraj, has reacted after Kurti's conspiracy mockery in the Parliament, where he said Deputy Prime Minister Haki Abazi had not been given the transcript of the Security Council meeting, where they had discussed with President Thaci about declaring the extraordinary situation.

Ironically with Kurt's statement, Behramaj said that anyone who didn't allow Haki Abbas to get that transcript did them a favor and saved him from legal offense by being very professional.

He referred to Law No. 03L-178 for Information Classification and Security Verification, which, according to Thaci's adviser, regulates what Hakki Abazi has been trying to do for meski interests.

It's really disturbing when you see a prime minister who doesn't know he's committing a legal offense if he says to his “minus” Bring me the shoot or transcript of Security Council meetings.

As a growing director and amateur, Hakki Abazi even in the government's recent fall has attempted to commit very serious legal violations and compromise national security, ignoring in all the legislation in power that regulates the area of national security.

To prove his servility to the chief and to hit the coalition partner, as former Prime Minister in the Parliament stated, Haki Abazi has made an effort to release the transcript of the National Security Council meetings for political and propagandistic needs, forgetting that it itself does not meet minimal security criteria for accessing classified information, as required with laws in force.

I consider trying to consciously to be very human, so we're entering basic lectures.

Article 1 of Law No. 03L-178 for Information Classification and Security Verification regulates what Hakki Abazi has been trying to do for meski interests.

The purpose of this law is to establish a unique system for classification and storage of information related to the security interests of Kosovo, as well as to verify the security of persons who have access to this information”, it says.

It seems that the founders of this law, when they've drafted it, have taken into account exactly the guys like Hakki Abazi, because in Article 18, paragraph 1 of this law says: “Classical matters don't leave official objects and in no way move to other public institutions unless the authority of the original classification (the information maker in this case, the Security Council) authorizes that. The public institution that accepts classified information does not allow the opening of those information without the approval of the authority that created them”.

Read for yourself about the circumstances when such action is permitted and the procedures to be followed, since they are not easy at all, and Hakki Abazi certainly does not do so for the nearest. But whoever didn't let him get that transcript, did it a favor and saved him from legal offense, showing him very professional.

Congratulations! Let's go away...

Article 19 of this law regulates both Physical Security and Information Security, which clearly emphasizes how information should be handled and preserved that affects national security, such as the transcripts of Kosovo Security Council meetings: “All public institutions guarantee physical security and information security related to classified information in accordance with standards and procedures defined through sub-legal acts, which are in line with relevant standards set by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and Statistics on Security of the European Union<1> this is said.

I'm pretty sure you didn't even get the opportunity to read these legal acts that you and all the institutions that you're running today.

Also, Article 22 that covers the General Rules on Classified Access also highlights the conditions that must be met for someone to have access to such information as those you've been trying to get.

Paragraph 1 of this article says:

1. A person may have access to classified information as “K O NFIDENCIAL”, “S XOX3> T EP SEKRET” on condition that person:

1.1. have valid security permits;

1.2. need to be aware of this information to carry out the mission or

His/her official duty; and

1.3. to have signed a confidential declaration.

I don't believe you've met any of these criteria. Furthermore, I am convinced that you have never even been subjected to any security verification process, just as the law requires and you have never submitted an app for verification, as required in Article 24 of the same law.

The methods you use to increase conspiracy in society are similar to those of illegal organizations, and that's one more fact that you're not fit to govern!