Aktakuse against two geodeses in Prizren, misuse of official duty

“Following the indictment, accused B.S., with a date of 10,12.2017 in Prizren, at an indefinite time in the quality of the official person ʹadodes licensed, exploiting duty or authority exceeds its official competencies in opposition to the working framework of the Kosovo Cadastra Agency, Article 3 for the standardification of cadastral measurements, in order to benefit whatever benefits for other persons in this case the P.J.J.J.J.J.J.J. and the village of Karadza, the country of the other person's rights in violation of the bill, with the quality of the contract, the procedure is stated in a command of the contract.J.

This is the complete communique:

The Constitutional Prosecutor in Prizren, the Department of Red Crimes, has filed charges against defendants with initials B.S., and L.R., in the quality of official persons as geodese, due to suspicion of having committed criminal work “Keqquid use of official position or authority (4)x2> from Article 422 paragraph 1 concerning paragraph 2 before22. Criminal code of the Republic of Kosovo (KPRK).

According to the indictment, the accused B.S., with the date 10,12.2017 in Prizren, at an indefinite time in the quality of the official person ʹ licensed geodes, exploiting his office or authority exceeds his official competencies contrary to the working framework of Kosovo's Cadastral Agency, Article 3 pöx0> standardisation of cadastral measurements, in order to benefit whatever benefits for other persons in this case, the P.J.J.J.J.J., Mg., the village of Kara, the country's <x0).

While accused by L.R., with the date 12,02.18 in Prizren, indefinitely in the quality of the official-colodette person at the Directorate for Geodesy and Kadast, exploiting the office or official authority exceeds its competencies so that it deliberately violates the rights of the other person Gj.J., acting contrary to the legal regulations of Kosovo's Cadral Agency. The same thing as geodesete at the Directorate for Geodesi and Cadaster did register with changes of property to co-owner Gj.G., in Cadastral-Map contrary to legal regulations, so that even though the subject was not complete since there was missing the identification document as well as the request and authorised of co-owner Gj.G., without his consent, they made the sharing of parcels with the act of 12.02.2018.

With these actions, accused B.S., and L.R. have fulfilled elements of criminal work “The use of official position or authority” according to the KPRK.

The prosecutor of the case in the case of an indictment, has proposed to the court that the accused be found guilty and be punished according to law for the criminal offense they are charged with.