Abrashi: We could have removed the tax in exchange for visa liberalisation, but we acted differently.

AAK official Gazmend Abraschi has cited some of the reasons the tax has, according to him, proved effective in reporting with Serbia. Abrashi q, in the “Debat Plus” in Ermal Pandur at RTV Duguagjini, has said that America is involved in dialogue due to the tax setting. America has not been involved in dialogue. Dialogue [...]
Abrashi q, in the “Debat Plus” in Ermal Pandur at RTV Duguagjini, has said that America is involved in dialogue due to the tax setting.
America has not been involved in dialogue. The European Commission, with which nothing has been achieved, has led the dialogue mainly. We, with the tax, have even put America” into talks.
He has said Kosovo has applied reciprocity with Serbia in the past as well, but there has been no benefit, Telegrafi conveys.
Abrashi says that the tax was the right and wise decision, and time will testify to that.
“We could have removed the tax in exchange for visa liberalisation, but time will show we've made a very good move that we haven't removed”.
The AAK official says that no measure or action has taken effect as much as putting the tax on citizen sensitivity for Serbian products.
Abrashi says that had it not been so harmful to the tax, Brnabyqi would not have spoken about the tax in the first word.












