EU on vaccine threshold, normality of the situation still far apart

Pfizer. B NTech is safe and prevents serious coronary disease, but he warns that not everything is “black and black” and that the long-term effects of the vaccine should be monitored says Elte in an interview for REL. It already orders those who oppose the vaccine that preventing the spread of coronary “is social responsibility”.

But he also contrasts what the United States and the United Kingdom have done. The U.S. and UK according to him have made the so-called emergency acceptance of the vaccine. In this case, if side effects are presented, you as patients who have been vaccinated are responsible for it.

While the EU, on the other hand, has made professional acceptance of the vaccine. This means that for whatever side effect, pharmaceutical companies are responsible. From the epidemiological perspective, three weeks earlier or three weeks later they make no difference.

We know that in a short term, vaccine is safe, effective.

But we don't have medium- to long-term data. Each time, side effects can occur. These are things that we don't know right now, so we have to carefully monitor the anti-corperous vaccine program.

What we can say is that with our present experience, the vaccine is safe. What comes next, he says, should be monitored by”, adding that in the summer alone, most of the population will be vaccinated, and that's when it's expected to return to normal, and it should continue with protective measures such as masks and distances.