Prosecutor EULEX that failed to investigate Krusha's massacre, today the prosecutor at the Special Court

It was 2012 when EULEX prosecutor Caesar Michalzuk interviewed dozens of witnesses to the massacre Little Krush. Although he had said that there are 56 suspects, only one man was convicted and condemned. The rest of Serbs continue to be free.

But, prosecutor Michalzuk, who has now been appointed prosecutor at the Special Court, had stopped investigating this massacre where 113 Albanian civilians were killed in 2013.

Among the witnesses was the survivor of the massacre, Bajram Zylefiu. He still has documents with the names of 56 Serbs who carried out this massacre, given to this prosecutor.

I have a day, that Europe is not. Europe has always lied to the Albanian people. UNMIK has been able to do something too, but I've heard that those documents are also kneed in the trash, now EULEX is the same”, says Zulphiu.

For Bajrami, it is absurd how prosecutors who failed to investigate the murder of 113 Albanian civilians in Krusha, today they are investigating KLA leaders.

The “that is also EULEX. Now this Michalsuk is going to punish Thaci, Veselin, Rexhep Selimi, etc. Jaran needs to see what they've got, do they have a Michailcuki dog that gives me a look at it?

For four hours, Michalzuk had also interviewed Gani Zylfiun, the deputy head of Krusha e Vogel village. But despair is great, since they were never contacted again.

“I've been expecting he's got something going on, but really nobody called us, and very little was done for this massacre of”, says Gani Zylfiu.

But in an answer for RTK, the EULEX mission, is proud of the fact that, for this case, out of 56 suspects, has been sentenced Darko Tasic months ago.

The blame for not following the investigation, this mission has left it. Code The criminal procedure, and the lack of the Law for Judgment in absentia.

“In the Le Krusha case and in all other cases, the Mission followed the Kosovo law, which at the time demanded that suspects be interviewed before the investigation is closed. There was no alternative but to suspend the investigation, otherwise the two-year period would expire and it would not be possible to continue afterwards without new evidence. The Kosovo law also said that no one could be tried in absentia”, their response said.

But in the question of television if they feel uncomfortable investigating war crimes cases, EULEX goes so far that it recommends what public television should do and how it should formulate questions.

Last week RTK has reported the appointment of prosecutor Caesar Mihailzuk as prosecutor to the Special Court. The latter, until a few months ago, had been chief of law rule in the EU office in Kosovo and one of the closest associates Nattilia Apostolovas.