“Osman s%ka legality to exercise President”

Riza Smaka, professor of constitutional law, has clarified the situation for the president's position following Hashim Thaci's resignation. He says with the Constitution the president cannot resign until he stressed that Vjosa Osmani has no legality to exercise the president's post. Smaca has considered it a serious blow to the state [...]
Riza Smaka, professor of constitutional law, has clarified the situation for the president's position following Hashim Thaci's resignation.
He says with the Constitution the president cannot resign until he stressed that Vjosa Osmani has no legality to exercise the president's post.
Smaca has considered the state of Kosovo a serious blow to acts by the Special Court, which, according to him, will serve our country's enemies very well, and unfortunately we do not have little.
Kosovo's “Constitution does not recognise the resignation. The U.S. example has it. Our constitution has four other bases, but it doesn't resign, so there is no resignation, and if the former president has expressed himself, of course from the moment of the infection but has wrongly expressed”, Smaka said.
He has since clarified that the concrete case refers to the 90th article of the Constitution.
“While others who are called on to make serious mistakes because there is no resignation, the president cannot resign to our state under the Constitution. The concrete case can only refer to Article 90 in the first paragraph of the constitution, president in absentia. In this case, the president voluntarily underscored it, voluntarily addressing the written ordinance to the Speaker of the Parliament why it would be in absentia for a certain time”, he said.
Osman, according to him, would be in the exercise of office at least six months.
He added that Thaci has not issued the written ordinance with the causes, not the reasons, of his temporary absence.
Then the aprior lacks the legitimacy of Mrs. Osman to exercise the presidential function. She wasn't supposed to rush because the end is jurist, that's a basic matter. This legal base had to presure”, Smaj said. “In the Constitution is expressally stated, not interpretation”.











