Latif: There could be two truths about Cacak, crime happened in front of the world.

philosophy professor Blerim Latifi speaks out against publishing any common history of Balkan peoples in the current situation. It says it's still too early. Name the “Joint History Project”, which has already been published in eleven languages of the world. My eye has been struck by the term [...]
philosophy professor Blerim Latifi speaks out against publishing any common history of Balkan peoples in the current situation. It says it's still too early.
Name the “Joint History Project”, which has already been published in eleven languages of the world.
My eye has been struck by the very term that the common story used, says Latifi.
For my opinion, such a project at the present moment we are in as the Balkans is premature and as such as the desired”, said Latif, invited to the Pressing Show in T7.
The Balkan <x0) peoples have not yet overcome their conflicts and tensions. Recently there is a renewal of these tensions, he added.
Latifi says the book financed by the EU attempts historical balance which is unacceptable.
The political interests you can balance, but historical facts can be balanced”, Latifi says.
You can't for the Recak massacre with a book of balanced facts or alternative facts”, Latif explains.
You can't have two facts, two truths about Recak when it's a crime that happened in front of the world. As you can for the former Holocaust two truths, he said.











