O Experts BSH does not suggest extreme measures, but actions to prevent and control of Ovid 19

In an article published in “The Lancet”, titled “Retireance with the Cardi-19: The struggle with the tools we have against”, the authors have written that based on information that has been collected so far from different parts of the world, has concluded that the best approach in the fight against the pandemic is the establishment of a long-term strategy with the focus of preventing the virus, protecting vulnerable groups and supporting research to understand the virus better, says the Schnet newspaper.

The authors in this article have been commemorating that many of the characteristics of the Sars-Cov-2 virus have not yet been fully understood, such as the level and response of immunity, the full spectrum of the disease, and the long-term consequences, the possibility of re-infectation, the potential of the virus to become wandering, etc.

“Sars-Cov-2 is not behaving epidemiologically like the flu virus and is continuing to return to new groups or explosions. With a more accurate public health-based response, including early detection of active cases, interrogating contacts and testing strategy, the spread of the virus in the community can be kept at a more manageable level of”, this article says.

The authors have taken for example countries such as South Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Vietnam, and Germany, which they feel have shown that this approach keeps broadcasting at stable and lower levels, and has also prevented increasing the number of patients lying in hospitals and general mortality, compared with countries that have not followed this approach.

This approach is based on three principles: understanding, trust, and participation of all population groups; lowering the level of transmission using epidemiological and public health interventions; and considering that the possible discovery of vaccine and medicine will only be part of the solution to the” problem.

According to authors, although these components for fighting pandemics are known to all public health experts, they have been neglected or misunderstood in some countries by both political leaders and the general public, broadcast newspapers.

List of epidemiological components and public health for response to the Coddy-19 pandemic:

A quick detext of infected persons, grounds, and spread regions

Isolation and management of infected persons with Coddy-19

Those who result in positive with Ovid 19 should be isolated and treated with the best health care practices.

Investigation into the blasts

Tracking contacts and diagnostic testing and/or serological research are necessary to investigate the bombings and to see where they happen.

A reduction in community transmission

Contact tracking should be done and their isolation itself, as well as testing those who show symptoms.

Strengthening Control in Respect of Measures

Make sure that individuals, communities, and organizations are fully engaged in observing physical distance, wearing masks, and washing hands.

Health System Protection

Make sure that the health system copes with the burden created by the disease, protecting health workers, and strengthening the practice of preventing and controlling infection.

Total risk reduction

Prevent or avoid danger of large public gatherings and events

Apply short-term preventative measures

Use short - term measures such as the restriction of circulation to regions where the spread of the virus is taking place until transmission is reduced or eliminated.

The funding of scientific research

Scientific research is essential to better understanding the characteristics of Covid-19.

Experts' groups have also recommended that international travel resources such as quarantine of returnees or tests The PCR, they have not produced the effects due to the Sars-Cov-2 interval. They have recommended encouraging travelers to monitor their state of health, as well as encouraging them to respect personal hygiene, physical distance, and masking.