Prizren's prosecution reacts: Haskuka has handed over no criminal charges

Prizren Mayor Mytaher Haskuka, during an interview on KTV, had criticised Prizren's Constitutional Prosecutor for non- Efficiency. He, during the June 24th interview, said he has taken the case to the prosecutor of the electronic archive, which Haskuka said cost 76 thousand euros to the municipality, but that this archive did not [...]
He, during the June 24th interview, said he has taken the case to the prosecutor of the electronic archive, which Haskuka said cost 76 thousand euros to the municipality, but that this archive does not exist at all. And even though he sent him to the DA, he said there's no answer for a year.
In another case, Haskuka has said 24 thousand euros have been provided for an unworked app.
The wise prince was carried out without signing by the commission for technical admission. When the commission didn't sign, but the director signed it, then it's a misuse of duty”, has added Haskuka.
According to Haskuca, the prosecution said that sufficient evidence exists even though signatures exist.
Haskuka has said he has filed 60 cases of abuse at the Prosecutor's Office, while, according to him, only three or four charges have been filed, of what he said is not satisfied.
But, the Constitutional Prosecutor in Prizren, is providing additional information in relation to those of the head of the municipality, Mytaher Haskuka.
In a reaction sent to the media, this prosecutor says Haskuka's claims do not stand.
“Mayor of Prizren, Mr. Mytaher Haskuka has also been publicly declared for the work of the Founding Prosecutor in Prizren. More specifically, he in the show has said he has submitted about 60 criminal charges to the Prosecutor on cases of abuse, which always according to his claim, the prosecution has filed only 3-4 charges. Also, Mr. Haskuka has mentioned with particular emphasis that they have recently handed in three criminal charges pertaining to electronic Archivation, the smart Prishren app, and the Central Prizren at the Youth Centre in Prizren. In order to provide fair information of the opinion, the Constitutional Prosecutor in Prizren felt obliged to clarify the opinion that none of Mr. Haskuka doesn't stay”, the prosecution said.
Furthermore, the response is said to have verified on the prosecutor's writing database, it has proved that Prizren's municipality has not submitted 60 criminal statements, as Haskuka claims, but only a statement of several violations concerning construction permits.
For the same announcement, the prosecution immediately authorized the police to start with the collection and collection of data for the case in question”, the prosecution further says.
Likewise, the Constitutional Prosecutor in Prizren, for the sake of correct opinion information, confirms that none of the three cases mentioned by Mr. Haskuka (Kykuka electronic archiva, smart Prince app, and Central Central Nrrhrah in the Youth Centre) has not been handed over to Prosecutor” at all.
At the same time, we explain the opinion that the Constitutional Prosecutor in Prizren has filed charges for some of the largest cases, where the accused were the directors of the Directorate of Inspection, which opinion has been announced over time. Other cases are also in the phase of the investigation”, the prosecution's reaction points out.











