Victors, losers, Democrats debate

The first debate of candidates targeting the Democrats' nomination to come up against Donald Trump in the 2020 elections went very wrong.

10 candidates were on stage from 24 as many as there are, and their responses were limited to 60 seconds and most candidates were unwilling to clash with each other.

The debate was less debate than the one - minute series of talks, writes Periscope.

These are the winners and these are the losers, according to CNN analyst Chris Cillizas:

PRAYERS

Julian Castro: Former San Antonio's chairman was competing under the radar too much under the radar until Wednesday night. But this is likely to change as he received too much attention during the debate, even as much as Elizabeth Warren did. He got involved in a debate with Beto O'Rourke about immigration and totally destroyed it.

Elizabeth Warren: She was asked more questions than anyone else. And yes, she managed to answer everything quite well.

Cory Booker: The senator from New Jersey won't be the biggest star from Wednesday's debate after it was caught in Castro, but he managed to inject himself into most overnight conversations even in those who weren't directed toward him. Booker took most of the time from 10 candidates.

HUNDS

Beto O'Rourke: Hard to see. He repeated the answers all the time. He was ashamed of Julian Castro.

Sound: The sound was nowhere during that night, with more and more with the American president himself complaining about the technical breakdown in the midst of the debate.

Beto O'Rourke: I know I already named him a loser. But he was weak enough to be placed twice on the list.

Amy Klobuchar: I had high expectations for senator from Minnesota because she had shown her capacity to excel. But not this time.

Bill de Blasio: If intervention in the most arrogant way possible in someone else's speech was Olympic sport, the chairman of New York would be the winner of the gold medal. /Periscope