Ismaili for Brovina's publication: Terrible, shouldn't have been public like this.

Why are you surprised at the picture? Yeah, the truth is it's terrible. Yes, very true that it was supposed to be published this way”, he wrote.

Ismail further pointed out that the most terrible truth is that each one of them was aware (of a few exceptions) but that they were silent about the matter for 20 years. “specifically those of the political subject who published the photo”.

That we're all our best friends for wool, just once again today in the worst way. Because in a hairy society, everyone only looks at the words of the individual as well as the very best interests, and never once the appearances of society, the kind that define us as society.

And a society that ignores my 10th identical cases to this in the picture for 20 years does not have a sense of dignity, which confirms that, in any other crisis, whenever it can be a country of people that has fallen, everyone has to keep looking at it just for their own words, like 20 years ago.

The shit company that reacts only three days when something like this comes up on Facebook, and it goes back to machiato on the fourth day, saying that it's a bloodline, which shit is going to burst out of anger that I'm on my own, with a rare individual wanting to try to do something good by raising his head, raising society and judicious in his own creation, and he writes.