2 hours agoAppeal confirms “Protos” accusations
Periskopi(7 years ago)
(7 years ago)The Court of Appeals has rejected as unconventional the defenders' complaints of dropping the indictment and opposing evidence, for accused Adem Grabovci, Zenun Pajaziti, Niyaziu Kryeziu, Besim Beqaj, Ismet Neziraj, Sedat Gashi, Fatmir Shudaj, Raja Abazi, Arbenita Pajaziti and Xavi Daj. Foundation Court Act in Pristina of 5 [...]
The Court of Appeals has rejected as unconventional the defenders' complaints of dropping the indictment and opposing evidence, for accused Adem Grabovci, Zenun Pajaziti, Niyaziu Kryeziu, Besim Beqaj, Ismet Neziraj, Sedat Gashi, Fatmir Shudaj, Raja Abazi, Arbenita Pajaziti and Xavi Daj.
The Constitutional Court Act in Pristina of March 5th 2019 has remained in force.
According to the prosecution indictment, all are charged that in the form of co-ordination co-operation, they have committed criminal acts “The violation of equal status of citizens and residents of the Republic of Kosovo” by Article 193 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kosovo.
According to the Appeals Court's assessment, in the controversial ruling, the first-instance court has provided sufficient for this phase of the criminal procedure, reason regarding well-based suspicion, about controversial evidence, and that it has correctly proven that sufficient legal-procedure evidence exists to continue.
Whether their guilt will be proven, it remains to be considered during the upcoming phase of the criminal procedure and the main examination of the case, which in this phase of the criminal procedure, guilt cannot be assumed by both court and parties.
