Latifi é Matoshit: When I was Ramush Haradinaj's warrior, you were in prison.

Replics are continuing between Prime Minister Haradinaj's adviser to Prime Minister Veselin, Blerim Latifi and Prime Minister Halil Matosi's adviser.

In Latif's final response to Mattosh, he mentions certain philosophical mistakes that Latif says are a kind of madness in themselves.

“monotheism”, “epstemology”, “andheu”, made together in a meatmash, which the instruments of logic have no way of unlocking. In philosophy, you need to be careful about the concepts, otherwise your foolishness is at the door”, Latif writes in the answer to Matosh.

On the other hand, Latifi tells Matosh that he is taking Haradinaj to defence, thinking that he (Latif) is attacking him. But Latifi tells Matosh he's not attacking Haradinaj, but he's just friendlyly advising him.Periscope broadcast.

Answer to Halil Matosh

COMM BIBLE PRINCIPLE AND KOSOVA'S BOOK

Halil, I had trouble reading the script! For one reason: in the motto of your writing you speak of the epistemological sin to the homeland”. All the philosophers in the world are gonna get to their feet, they won't be able to get through this sentence! And, you know why? Because it's a sentence worth publishing in some dictionary of crazy sayings. “mAKA”, “epstemology”, “andheu”, made together in a meatmash, which the instruments of logic have no way of unlocking. In philosophy, you need to be careful with your concepts, otherwise your foolishness is at the door.
Now I'm going to the political issue, which you get on fire in your text. 
Your entire text is a bad reading and biased status of my status on the problem of fleeing citizens from Kosovo. 
You take defense of Ramush Haradinaj without being attacked by me. Halil, when I was a fighter in the area led by Ramush Haradinaj, you were in prison. You can't tell Ramush. What you wrongly call my attack on Haradinaj government is actually my friendly advice to all of you. Free advice, anyway! 
Nature scientists tell us how a completely local event occurring somewhere can trigger an avalanche of events on a global scale. The example of the butterfly is famous: a butterfly's <x0... butterfly wings in Brazil can cause a tornado in Texas”. 
Halil, that's what happens in human society. Examples abound. Let's not go too far, take the example of the riots involving the Arab world from 2011 onward. All those terrible riots and bloodshed that followed began from a local event of the case, one morning in the capital of Tunisia. Mohammed Bouazizi, a young man who was immersed in total misery, lived by selling vegetables on the street in his chariot. One day police officers of Ben Ali's corrupt regime, for their personal pleasure, confiscated his chariot, his only chance of keeping his family alive. In the state of radical despair and unable to do anything else, Bouazizi set himself on fire. His tragic self - sacrifice, within a few days, lifted the whole Middle East to its feet. Then, the chances of a Panarabik democratic revolution were extinguished by interference in the unrest of terrorist movements. 
Halil, you can say that the example I took is not about the situation in Kosovo. However, this can be discussed. I'm not prone to rapid generalization and analogy. But I ask you, is there any difference between those cops that the poor Bouazizi was confiscated by the cart and one of your deputies who comes out and says that “with the other than the AAK men I'd hired at the bottom of the time? 
I think there isn't. It is the same arrogance of people whose power has been transmuted to the extent that they have been overwhelmed by the most basic sense of justice! 
This statement definitely means: In this country there is no bread for those who are not with us! 
This statement, with its extreme arrogance, is a call for unrest. In Kosovo, however, riots do not occur because people in this country love their homeland. They'd rather leave him than burn him. That is also the fundamental reason Albin Kurt's dream of a Leninist revolution in Kosovo failed. 
Today we have come to a situation where financial corruption has been added to what Monteskje in the Law Spirit called “the corruption of principles”. The corruption of principles is the situation when the state, from an organization designed to serve the present good, is transformed into an organization that serves the collective good of those who have power. 
Halil, your MP's statement is the official declaration of this doctrine. I don't mean that this doctrine starts with him. He's just her spokesman. With his own will. 
This doctrine has long operated as the sole ideology of hundreds of state officials and many politicians of all political parties. 
We have to eradicate this doctrine from the state camera and political parties. 
Otherwise, this place has to be left alone in old age and old age. 
I assure you!