7 hours agoMarco Djuric: There is no evidence that we committed a crime in Recak
Periskopi(7 years ago)
(7 years ago)The so-called director of the Office for Kosovo in Serbia's Government, Marko Djurovic, has said the purpose of NATO's shelling was that no Serb remains in Kosovo. But, he says that this goal was not achieved and that it will never be reached”, writes B92, conveys Periscope. Meanwhile, Djuric also mentioned Recak, [...]
Marko Djuric says purpose NATO was to take Serbia's territory by exercising aggression in 1999.
Someone tried to kidnap us for 10,887 square kilometers of Serbia, trying to annex us part of the country. We have witnessed how the borders between Kosovo and Albania have been removed in recent months and no voice has been issued in response to this” action, Djuric has said, Pryspiscopi follows.
He's been saying how the second resort is. NATO has also been the geopolitical weakness of Serbia and the Serbian people in the Balkans.
As someone who witnessed and experienced what the consequences of March 1999 were, I can say that I have no dilemma that this was an aggression against an independent entity and that there was no reason for such intervention”, he said further.
He has said that UN mechanisms clearly define the conditions for how to intervene against an independent state”.
If we start with Recak, we have analysis from there that there was no crime that could have led to such aggression. Legal institutions have never confirmed the suspicion that something like this happened in the village of Recak or any other Kosovo village, he has said.
Our “NLA v.j) When aggression began NATO, there was not a single fact that human rights were being violated. During the NATO bombings, they used their planes in co-operation with the KLA to attack not only Yugoslavia's military bases but also the civilian population”, Djuric has said. /Periscope.
