The prosecution ceases investigations into the educator: Begins procedure against the girl from Drenas for false statements

The State Prosecutor has issued media communiqués where she has informed the opinion of the case for allegedly sexual abuse of minors from Drenas, writes Periscope.

The prosecutor of the case has provided details of the case, even confessing to her interview, where she after criminal discussion against educator U.S. then he withdrew his statements.

According to the State Prosecutor, there have been no concrete results following forensic examination as a method to prove sexual abuse. The strange thing about this is that the D.A. in any row or paragraph does not name the fact that it damaged A.G. She was a minor during her time of sexual intercourse with her older teacher. Those over 19 years of age who have sexual relations with minors, even with their consent, bear legal consequences.

In fact, the prosecution, taking on two conflicting statements and the forensic examination mentioned in addition to having cleared the entire United States of America, has also initiated investigative proceedings against the injurer for false announcements or gossip. /Periscope

This is the complete communique:

Pristina, February 12th, 2019 The Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina reports the opinion that regarding the case for allegedly sexual abuse of minors from Drenasi, A. G., he's received a criminal complaint on 21.09.2017, and the prosecutor of the case has made a decision to launch the investigation in 10,01,2018.

The prosecutor of the case, on the case of interviewing minor injury, A. G., in 11,01.2018, has initially announced the same with its rights, conform Article 62, 63, 217 and 218 of the KP, in the presence of the legal representative (father), the defender of the victims, the lawyer on official duty, and the lawyer with the authorship of the suspect.

During the juvenile interview, it has been noted that the same has generally denied the declaration given in the Kosovo Police, on 14,09.2017, which states that there has been sexual abuse by the suspect, St. J. Despite the prosecutor's continued insistence that damaged to tell the truth, and if he does the opposite, the prosecutor will exercise criminal consent against her, for false statements, she has by all means rejected all previous statements, arguing that the first statement given in the Kosovo Police has been entirely fabricated.

With the aim of collecting evidence during the investigation's development phase, the prosecutor, on the basis of his request, has accepted from the Department of Legal Medicine, Gynecological-Physical Examination for injury. 15.09.2017. The prosecutor of the case has also interviewed the suspect, St. J., in 11,01.2018, who has generally denied claims declared by the damaged, in the first statement issued in the Kosovo Police Department.

Based on the results of all these investigative actions, the prosecutor of the case makes a decision to drop the investigation, counted with PP/II No. 5763/17, dt. 19,01.2018, with the reasoning that, in question, because there have been two (2) conflicting statements, and forensic examination, which has not resulted in any concrete results, concludes that in the actions of the suspect, the U.S. J., there are no incriminating elements for criminal work, sexual misconduct, Article 235 of KPRK.

Since the prosecutor of the case has had two (2) conflicting and damaged statements, the prosecutor of the case compiles an official note, in 19,01.2018, which requires that the investigation procedure against the injury be initiated in the direction of the criminal offense, News or false slander, by Article 390 money. 2 connected to money. 1, KPRK, and wants this official note to be considered criminalised.

On the other hand, in the second case the criminal procedure is under way in Pristina, in which the criminal case is equally damaged, the prosecution will keep the opinion on running the procedure informed.