Pronto: The defense calls media show an indictment

After hearing the defenders of the accused and his indictees, special prosecutor Drita Hajdari has responded.

According to her, this criminal case deals with a phenomenon of division of posts on political grounds. It has also spoken of using the evidence used in another case if it can be used for a new criminal procedure. She has said that this is confirmed by a decision by the Court of Appeals, Koha Ditore reports.

According to her, the prosecution couldn't close its eyes to these tapes. She has even said that one of the main objections of the defenders is that these surveillances would have to be destroyed by 2016, however, because the prosecution did and the parties would have to take care of themselves.

The order of the accused, Ademi Grabovci, has had a lawyer then and he could see if they've been destroyed”, she said.

Hajdari has argued nothing about the actual state of evidence in which he has based the indictment except the procedural issues on the reason that such a thing will happen in the future.

Lawyer Besnik Berisha has said prosecutor Hajdari has not responded to the main issues filed.

Berisha is focused on how the prosecution has qualified criminal acts in this act. As these indictees are known, they are not charged with any of the criminal acts of the Penal Affairs chapter that link corruption, but the qualifications were made for criminal acts linked to violating the equal status of Kosovo citizens.

This has happened because if works were qualified according to the corruption chapter, then criminal acts have reached the time of the prescription.

Berisha has said that in this indictment, the Prosecution has not presented any injuries or beneficiaries. Berisha has irony that if prosecutor Hajdari claims the evidence the prosecutor had at his disposal EULEX has not handled them well, then should the examination be made as to which prosecutor is less sensitive and who is more vulnerable.

Hajdari has tried several times to interrupt lawyer Berisha with the reasoning that this is being debated and that, according to him, should not be done at the courtroom. She has said she will not allow such a thing to happen, while Berisha has replied having the door open to leave.